BASK IN THE GLORY!

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 04/26/2017 at 10:17 • Filed to: None

7

19

Ash78, voting early and often > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/26/2017 at 10:20

1

Overland and Expedition for the 99% crowd.

benjrblant > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/26/2017 at 10:24

2

Also this one:

because it still starts somewhere around 90,000 USD

davesaddiction @ opposite-lock.com > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/26/2017 at 10:24

1

Might as well go full ridiculous.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > benjrblant 04/26/2017 at 10:25

0

I do like that. So much potential.

Smallbear wants a modern Syclone, local Maple Leafs spammer > benjrblant 04/26/2017 at 10:30

1

Ohhhh. G-Wagen pickup plz

KnowsAboutCars > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/26/2017 at 10:30

1

4x4^2 or bust!

benjrblant > Smallbear wants a modern Syclone, local Maple Leafs spammer 04/26/2017 at 10:35

1

Mercedes-Benz will hit you up for $119,900 [AUD, ~90,000USD] before on-road, or should that be off-road, costs.

Per whichcar.com.au . I don’t think that includes the tray.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > KnowsAboutCars 04/26/2017 at 10:44

0

Most of the Squareds don’t have the spare tire on the back and they look naked without them.

BvdV - The Dutch Engineer > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/26/2017 at 10:52

0

Probably because the squared tires don’t look like they fit that housing. So I’m guessing this is either a too small spare, or an empty housing to make it look better.

KnowsAboutCars > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/26/2017 at 10:57

2

The stock spare is pretty useless though in the squared I think.

But then there’s this:

TheHondaBro > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/26/2017 at 11:02

1

Wrong.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > BvdV - The Dutch Engineer 04/26/2017 at 11:09

1

I’d almost be Ok with it being an empty housing just for aesthetics in this case.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > KnowsAboutCars 04/26/2017 at 11:09

0

That’s how I’d do it.

BvdV - The Dutch Engineer > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/26/2017 at 11:12

1

Yeah me too, though a real spare like Knowsaboutcars posted looks better IMHO.

Vicente Esteve > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/26/2017 at 12:01

1

YEAH

HammerheadFistpunch > benjrblant 04/26/2017 at 12:11

0

The reviews are pretty hard for it. Mostly because it has no suspension to accommodate the super high payload. I still can’t figure out how Mercedes rates it that high, its not like the axles are that much beefier than anything else in its class.

benjrblant > HammerheadFistpunch 04/26/2017 at 12:14

0

“LOLZsuspensiontravel” or something.

But dang it looks sharp.

HammerheadFistpunch > benjrblant 04/26/2017 at 12:16

0

Yeah, take out the stupid duty coils and put in some standard coils and you would have something pretty great.

4850 lbs payload! Thats insane for something that size.

benjrblant > HammerheadFistpunch 04/26/2017 at 12:29

0

Yeah, that’s nuts. IIRC, the single cab HDJ79 or something with a tray is rated for around 3,000lbs. 4850 is f350/c3500 territory.