![]() 04/04/2017 at 23:22 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
2006 M5 with 51k miles. Less than $3,000 per cylinder!
![]() 04/04/2017 at 23:24 |
|
Hmmm, I wonder how much extra for the carmax warranty...
![]() 04/04/2017 at 23:25 |
|
![]() 04/04/2017 at 23:33 |
|
I bet its like 3k for 2 years. Totally worth it.
![]() 04/04/2017 at 23:36 |
|
At 5k for 2 years I’d buy it on this thing. And sleep at night. Haha
![]() 04/04/2017 at 23:37 |
|
I almost feel like I should have made an offer before posting here...
![]() 04/04/2017 at 23:40 |
|
Except we’re all talk and no action, so you’re safe.
I’ll be seriously looking next spring, not this year, anyways. But I’d be all over it if I was in the market. With that warranty.
![]() 04/05/2017 at 00:20 |
|
Fun fact: almost no aftermarket warranties will cover these any more. They’re horrible cars with a siren song, attracting unwitting sailors to run aground on their rocky shoals.
![]() 04/05/2017 at 00:47 |
|
It’s at CarMax. No offers there, just a set price. Also the only people here that have enough money/credit to not be just talk have cars above this range. We all know how bad they are to maintain so it’s in a middle ground of being too expensive to casually buy but too cheap and expensive to maintain for some of the more wealthy Oppoers.
![]() 04/05/2017 at 01:09 |
|
28k for an 11 year old car that could cost you many thousands a year to maintain. Seems like a smart choice, aside from the fact that people with that kind of money would probably seriously consider a lot of other things.
The conundrum: Too old to be a real status symbol, too expensive to be an impulse buy for someone that still considers it one.