"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
04/04/2017 at 12:22 • Filed to: None
1
9|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
04/04/2017 at 12:22 • Filed to: None | 1
| 9 |
We’re studying Pride and Prejudice in my film studies class right now, which isn’t exactly full of automotive goodness. Instead, the film for today’s round is one of the movies I watched over spring break. It features, most prominently, a 1987 Chevy Caprice Classic, although the one in the film is blue.
Additionally, like many modern films, we’ve got a smattering of Audi product placement. In this case it’s an orange 2013 R8 V10 and a white 2014 A8L. Remember, no cheating!
EDIT: Without even having seen the film, Mr.R got it right. The film, which presumably blew its entire budget on getting Tom Hanks to star in it, was the recent but relatively unknown drama A Hologram for the King.
Stapleface
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/04/2017 at 12:57 |
|
Only thing I’ve got (and I’m pretty sure I’m wrong) is Avengers: Age of Ultron. Pretty sure Tony Stark drove an Orange R8 in that.
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Stapleface
04/04/2017 at 13:00 |
|
He did, but that was a 2nd gen car, a 2015.
haveacarortwoorthree2
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/04/2017 at 13:04 |
|
Without the Audis, I was going to suggest a movie actually called Blue Caprice (about the DC snipers). Don’t remember the year that car was, though.
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> haveacarortwoorthree2
04/04/2017 at 13:06 |
|
Yup, I figured that would be the obvious answer if I only gave the Chevy, so I threw in the Audis as well. They aren’t nearly as pervasive in the film as the B-Body, but they still get attention.
bob and john
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/05/2017 at 12:03 |
|
part of me want to say one of the transporters, but those had black A8s...
second guess hitman: agent 47, though I dont remember the R8
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> bob and john
04/05/2017 at 12:05 |
|
Nope. The Caprice had the biggest role in this film. It almost blew up, kind of.
Chariotoflove
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/05/2017 at 12:11 |
|
No clue, but came by to say the I kinda liked the Pride and Prejudice movie. But, as always, the original book version is better:
|
bob and john
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/05/2017 at 12:11 |
|
mmmm, one of the fast and furiouses?
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> bob and john
04/05/2017 at 12:13 |
|
Nope