Nope.

"bhtooefr" (bhtooefr) 02/26/2017 at 16:29 • Filed to: fourpropsbad, hoverbike, russia, hoversurf, scorpion

0

10

Nope nope nope nope nope.

bob and john > bhtooefr 02/26/2017 at 16:35

1

10/10, would fly

Though I do think a shroud around those props might be a good idea.

bhtooefr > bob and john 02/26/2017 at 16:43

1

That’s probably about half of my nope, the complete lack of prop protection.

Deal Killer - Powered by Focus > bhtooefr 02/26/2017 at 16:45

2

Still a nope on my part, but it’s been done before, and for, probably, a lot less money.

Daily Drives a Dragon - One Last Lap > bhtooefr 02/26/2017 at 16:52

1

Maybe put something over the props. Because that would get rid of a good amount of the oh shit i just lost a hand factor.

nermal > bhtooefr 02/26/2017 at 16:55

1

The idea of riding a personal quad-rotor is neat.

The idea that a gust of wind outside could cause you to fall off, then get finely chopped by the un-shielded rotors before falling to your doom in a cloud of chunky red mist, is not.

bhtooefr > Deal Killer - Powered by Focus 02/26/2017 at 16:56

1

Although he at least put prop guards on...

InFierority Complex > bhtooefr 02/26/2017 at 16:59

0

Safer than this thing at least.

Urambo Tauro > bhtooefr 02/26/2017 at 17:14

0

This needs a racing series.

sn4cktimes > bhtooefr 02/26/2017 at 17:36

0

I’d try it out. But agree with everyone else it needs guards of some kind.

knowonelse > bhtooefr 03/12/2017 at 01:07

0

Uh, anyone else notice that in every single one of these videos they never let us hear the real sound they make. And, flying inside a building with you know, vertical load-bearing posts is a really bad idea. Hitting one of those with a spinning blade would be a very bad thing for both the building and the pilot. Outdoors on a grassy field early in the morning when wind is low would be much much safer, at least for the building.