Seen In D.C.

"S65" (granthp) 02/20/2017 at 14:40 • Filed to: CTS-V, Wagon, CTS-V Wagon, Dots, D.C., Cadillac CTS-V

12

13

Y’all like these, right?

Ash78, voting early and often > S65 02/20/2017 at 14:44

3

On paper, yeah. In person, it feels a lot more like the other wagons where the entire back end was an afterthough, so it ends up looking like a badly-camo’d sedan. Yeah, I went there.

PatBateman > Ash78, voting early and often 02/20/2017 at 14:48

5

You, sir, are high.

CB > S65 02/20/2017 at 14:48

1

I dig it, but I don’t think I could ever own one based on price and fuel mileage alone.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > S65 02/20/2017 at 14:48

1

Yes

facw > S65 02/20/2017 at 14:49

2

Nah, that D-pillar is super ugly.

PatBateman > S65 02/20/2017 at 14:50

1

The manual version will be a collector’s car in a decade.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Ash78, voting early and often 02/20/2017 at 14:54

1

facw > PatBateman 02/20/2017 at 14:54

0

Doesn’t mean he’s wrong.

Ash78, voting early and often > PatBateman 02/20/2017 at 14:58

1

High on good design! And maybe some epoxy fumes, but the two go hand in hand.

Andy Sheehan, StreetsideStig > CB 02/20/2017 at 15:10

0

Same here, in terms of price at least. So someday I’m going to get a non-V wagon and just make a clone. This would probably be easier than finding a manual one, anyway.

xyzabc > PatBateman 02/20/2017 at 16:06

1

The manual version will be has been a collector’s car in a decade since it first came out.

PatBateman > xyzabc 02/20/2017 at 16:37

1

They’ve gone for a premium over the autos, but I mean they’ll gain in appreciation in a marked way.

IAN_Z > Ash78, voting early and often 02/20/2017 at 23:37

1

It’s because the rear doors are from the sedan. And the D-pillar is really ugly. That generation of Cadillac design has always seemed really hamfisted to me.