Help me identify this car!

Kinja'd!!! "Jagvar" (Jagvar)
02/19/2017 at 20:37 • Filed to: None

Kinja'd!!!0 Kinja'd!!! 11
Kinja'd!!!

I found this old car in the woods today. Can anyone help me narrow down the make and model? Maybe even the approximate year? There’s not a whole lot to work with, but you’re a smart bunch.

Kinja'd!!! Kinja'd!!! Kinja'd!!! Kinja'd!!!

DISCUSSION (11)


Kinja'd!!! xyzabc > Jagvar
02/19/2017 at 20:51

Kinja'd!!!0

Looks like 1940's Plymouth.


Kinja'd!!! sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Jagvar
02/19/2017 at 20:52

Kinja'd!!!4

I’m going to guess it’s a ‘46 Plymouth or thereabouts. The dash is the biggest clue. The one picture below has the same shape (2 doors, sedan shape) so my full answer is 1946 Plymouth Special Deluxe 2-Door Sedan. And if Special Deluxe 2-Door Sedan isn’t the most 1940's car name ever, I don’t know what is.

Kinja'd!!!

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! Jcarr > Jagvar
02/19/2017 at 20:57

Kinja'd!!!0

Scratch that. Listen to SM70, he’s a guru.

1940s Ford or Mercury? That dash looks unique.

Kinja'd!!!

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! Jcarr > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/19/2017 at 20:57

Kinja'd!!!0

Damn, you’re good.


Kinja'd!!! sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Jcarr
02/19/2017 at 20:58

Kinja'd!!!1

I’m good at Google ;)


Kinja'd!!! ADabOfOppo; Gone Plaid (Instructables Can Be Confusable) > Jagvar
02/19/2017 at 21:17

Kinja'd!!!0

Rusty and mostly gone.


Kinja'd!!! Jagvar > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/19/2017 at 21:35

Kinja'd!!!1

You’re right, the extended rear window would suggest a ’46. The thing that eats at me is that the rear bumper on the ’46 looks like this:

Kinja'd!!!

...while the bumper that matches the woods car is found on a ’42 Plymouth Club Coupe:

Kinja'd!!!

This makes me confused.


Kinja'd!!! sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Jagvar
02/19/2017 at 21:42

Kinja'd!!!0

You’re right, the bumper is off the ‘42. But the rear window shape and trunk line are definitely not the ‘42 Coupe.


Kinja'd!!! shop-teacher > Jagvar
02/19/2017 at 22:38

Kinja'd!!!1

The bumper very easily could’ve been replaced with a ‘42 years later.


Kinja'd!!! Jagvar > shop-teacher
02/19/2017 at 22:44

Kinja'd!!!1

That’s the theory I’m going with.


Kinja'd!!! RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht > Jagvar
02/20/2017 at 09:19

Kinja'd!!!1

Counterargument - it could have been an early ‘46 made with a ‘42 bumper, because ‘42's production run was cut short, and there were likely extra ‘42 bumpers in stock when production resumed. Chrome items back then tended to have a *really* long lead time and be outsourced - see the case of the early Morris Minors which had bumpers which were too narrow ordered even before the body dies were finalized.