"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
02/14/2017 at 12:01 • Filed to: None | 0 | 17 |
Another week, another film in my film class, which means another round of guessing the film based upon its automotive content. This week’s film features a car more prominently than the first two, but I’m guessing it will be a bit harder. We’ve got two characters carrying out a hit list overnight in a ‘95 Ford Crown Victoria taxi.
Once again, no cheating or using IMCDB.
EDIT: That was fast. Opposaurus and FSI tied in guessing it. The film was Collateral (2004) starring Jamie Foxx, Tom Cruise, Jada Pinkett Smith, and Mark Ruffalo. Also, Jason Statham reprising his role as The Transporter.
Ash78, voting early and often
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/14/2017 at 12:03 | 0 |
Is this the one with Tom Cruise?
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Ash78, voting early and often
02/14/2017 at 12:04 | 0 |
He’s in it.
OPPOsaurus WRX
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/14/2017 at 12:05 | 1 |
collateral
FSI - alcohol enthusiast with a car problem
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/14/2017 at 12:05 | 1 |
Collateral with Jamie Foxx and Tom Cruise
Ash78, voting early and often
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/14/2017 at 12:06 | 1 |
I can’t remember the name without cheating, but Jamie Foxx is the cab driver, IIRC. If it was another prolific black actor, it’s not racism, it’s just a bad memory.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> OPPOsaurus WRX
02/14/2017 at 12:07 | 0 |
You got it!
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Ash78, voting early and often
02/14/2017 at 12:08 | 1 |
Nope, it was Jamie foxx. Film was Collateral.
OPPOsaurus WRX
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/14/2017 at 12:09 | 1 |
http://oppositelock.kinja.com/name-that-tune-1792324905
Your boy, BJR
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/14/2017 at 12:09 | 1 |
Collateral?
Ash78, voting early and often
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/14/2017 at 12:10 | 1 |
Thanks! My memory said it was a one-word title starting with “C” or “D.” Memory is a funny thing, but my brain is more photographic than contextual. It’s weird like that.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Your boy, BJR
02/14/2017 at 12:14 | 0 |
Yup
Your boy, BJR
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/14/2017 at 12:18 | 0 |
That’s weird for a film class.
Textured Soy Protein
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/14/2017 at 12:19 | 1 |
For some reason I wanted to say Mrs. Doubtfire. But that was only based on the picture, not your very-obvious description. The cityscape kinda looks like this.
I like Michael Mann but sometimes his movies get a bit dumb. I don’t care how many people trash Miami Vice, even with all its flaws I still enjoy that movie.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Your boy, BJR
02/14/2017 at 12:29 | 0 |
A bit, yeah.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Textured Soy Protein
02/14/2017 at 12:30 | 0 |
Yeah, next time I’m gonna be more vague with the description, if I give one at all.
404 - User No Longer Available
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/14/2017 at 12:34 | 1 |
Collateral. Jamie Foxx, Tom Cruise.
EDIT: didn’t see it was answered already.
Frank W. Doom
> Ash78, voting early and often
02/14/2017 at 12:36 | 0 |
yes, and its one of my favorite movies featuring him. he does an excellent job, and how often do you get to see him play the bad guy?