![]() 02/13/2017 at 13:41 • Filed to: Ford | ![]() | ![]() |
Future classic or demolition derby material? You decide.
![]() 02/13/2017 at 13:44 |
|
Great engine; terrible car.
![]() 02/13/2017 at 13:45 |
|
Driving range target
![]() 02/13/2017 at 13:48 |
|
Derby every day.
They are worse than previous style in every single way, and are an embarrassment of a car. If any Taurus is going to be a future collectible it’ll be the 87-95 ones.
![]() 02/13/2017 at 13:48 |
|
Derby. That’ll never be pretty
![]() 02/13/2017 at 14:31 |
|
The only 3rd gen Taurus I would consider as a future classic would be a Rose Mist SHO...
![]() 02/13/2017 at 14:41 |
|
Ha ha. Every styling que on this version is a fucking oval.
![]() 02/13/2017 at 15:03 |
|
Excellent derby fodder
![]() 02/13/2017 at 15:58 |
|
That engine was put to much better use in this car, except for the whole prematurely-rusting-to-bits problem.