Singer - rear "seats"

"BJ" (benjamin-bignell) 12/08/2017 at 11:47 • Filed to: Singer, Old man yells at clouds

0

11

I get that these aren’t meant to be sat on, but they look like medieval torture devices.

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!

Why not just put a straight bench? I dunno, something about these just rubs me the wrong way...

Textured Soy Protein > BJ 12/08/2017 at 11:54

1

Singer 911s are built out of 964s. The rear seat starts out like this:

McMike > BJ 12/08/2017 at 11:55

2

Why not just put a straight bench?

Because they keep the transmission under that hump.

Ash78, voting early and often > McMike 12/08/2017 at 11:56

0

I thought 911 back seats were hump-free.

davesaddiction @ opposite-lock.com > BJ 12/08/2017 at 11:58

0

I’m sure they have a disclaimer that those are just for looks.

seats near roll bar and no helmets = recipe for disaster

That said, I would gladly cram myself back there in exchange for a spirited ride in a Singer...

Takuro Spirit > BJ 12/08/2017 at 11:59

4

I’ve sat in worse.

Sir Halffast > BJ 12/08/2017 at 12:00

0

But will it baby?

Chariotoflove > BJ 12/08/2017 at 12:00

0

I’d like flatter to make more room for storage, which is the true calling of that space.

McMike > Ash78, voting early and often 12/08/2017 at 12:10

2

I don’t even think there’s room back there for me to have sex with myself, much less another person.

BJ > Textured Soy Protein 12/09/2017 at 00:03

0

At least you could sit there without breaking your spine.

BJ > McMike 12/09/2017 at 00:04

0

 Transmission or no, they could surely make a much more functional surface than what they’ve done there.

BJ > davesaddiction @ opposite-lock.com 12/09/2017 at 00:06

0

Absolutely not safe for passengers, so why make half-assed fake seats?