Why would I sped $3.5 million

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 11/19/2017 at 19:31 • Filed to: None

1

22

On this ugly new !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! when one of !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! costs 1/40th as much (holy f**k) and actually retains some semblance of grace and style and class which the new one, with its “Chrysler 300 with a fake Bentley grill” front end lacks entirely?

The above pictured car is basically my perfect modern car, if you’re wondering. 

Spanfeller is a twat > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/19/2017 at 19:40

1

does it rev or does it harrumph?

Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/19/2017 at 19:43

0

Do I understand correctly that the above automobile costs $3,500,000?

HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/19/2017 at 19:43

1

That is definitely prettier than the new one.

dogisbadob > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/19/2017 at 19:44

0

looks like a Camaro with a 300 grille

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo 11/19/2017 at 19:46

0

No, the above car costs $83,000. The new Mulsanne ‘vert in the first line is the $3.5 mil atrocity.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > dogisbadob 11/19/2017 at 19:47

2

If we’re talking about the new one, I agree.

Steve in Manhattan > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/19/2017 at 19:51

0

And nobody, save someone who works for Bentley, would have any idea what you have. Spend 400K on a regular one, or better, get one with a BUMPER-TO-BUMPER warranty (like a Rolls Dawn) from a dealer or Carmax.

dogisbadob > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/19/2017 at 19:54

1

yes, the new one, of course

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Steve in Manhattan 11/19/2017 at 19:54

2

Somehow I think that, using the $320,000 left over, I can find/afford a mechanic to work on it. Just kind of a hunch.

Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/19/2017 at 20:07

1

Well, I think the Rolls thing is pretty atrocious also, but I’m confused as to what it actually is.

Here’s what I’d spend $83,000 on:

Steve in Manhattan > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/19/2017 at 20:11

2

Or buy a fleet of Boxsters to use when it breaks ...

Shoop > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/19/2017 at 20:57

1

Because it’s ugly

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo 11/19/2017 at 21:55

0

Please tell me you didn’t just call the Phantom Drophead hideous..

Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/20/2017 at 08:26

0

I didn’t. I called it atrocious . It looks like a brick on wheels. And isn’t it really an Audi in an expensive suit? And half a million dollars... And I’ll add insult to injury by ordering my CTS-V with an automatic transmission... But can we agree to disagree and still be friends?

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo 11/20/2017 at 09:16

0

1. I’m still hurt.

2. BMW. VW/Audi makes Bentley, BMW makes Rolls.

3. Ugh fine.

Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/20/2017 at 09:20

0

I didn’t realize Bentley and Rolls weren’t the same company.

Milky > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/20/2017 at 09:21

1

Honestly the chrome grill on the old is kind of ugly too. If you got the new one all in one color it’d be nice.

Old photoshop but still.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo 11/20/2017 at 10:44

1

Used to be, back in the day. They went their separate ways back in the late 90's.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Milky 11/20/2017 at 10:44

0

True enough

BJ > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/20/2017 at 12:26

0

Convertibles don’t interest me, and big convertibles like this are ALL kinds of boring.

If I’m rich enough to buy a car like that, I’m rich enough to keep myself properly isolated from the peasants. If I need sun, I go to my villa or whatever...

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > BJ 11/20/2017 at 13:06

0

I love them, largely because I love huge luxury cars and convertibles independently of each other.

BJ > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/20/2017 at 22:13

1

Huge luxury cars? Yes, please.

That’s nearly perfect. If only I was swimming in dollar bills...