I can't bring myself to get over the interior

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 10/20/2017 at 19:31 • Filed to: None

0

23

But for those who aren’t bothered by such things, this !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! looks like a great deal on a clean, reliable, comfortable, and surprisingly quick DD.

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!

CaptDale - is secretly British > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/20/2017 at 19:33

0

That gear knob....

Chariotoflove > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/20/2017 at 19:36

0

You could do worse.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > CaptDale - is secretly British 10/20/2017 at 19:37

0

Yeah, like I said, I couldn’t do it.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Chariotoflove 10/20/2017 at 19:37

0

True, but you’d have to put in some effort.

Chariotoflove > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/20/2017 at 19:42

1

Yeah, but I’m kinda digging the wheels.

CaptDale - is secretly British > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/20/2017 at 19:47

1

Yeah, I agree 110%

Wacko > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/20/2017 at 19:50

1

For a 1997 that interior ain’t that bad, but that shifter is crap

Captain of the Enterprise > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/20/2017 at 19:51

1

That shifter is appalling

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Captain of the Enterprise 10/20/2017 at 19:57

1

Isn’t it though?

itschrome > Chariotoflove 10/20/2017 at 20:25

0

Right, it could be a joseph abboud edition.

itschrome > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/20/2017 at 20:26

0

It could be worse. Say hello to the joseph abboud edition GS

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > itschrome 10/20/2017 at 20:35

1

Actually I find that to be an improvement. Brown and tan, no matter how tackily applied, will always be superior to grey and greyer.

Dr. Zoidberg - RIP Oppo > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/20/2017 at 20:43

1

It’s brown, so people won’t know if you’ve shit in the driver’s seat before.

fhrblig > CaptDale - is secretly British 10/20/2017 at 21:00

1

What the hell is that thing? It’s insanity.

Column shift + bench would be preferable, but I don’t know if that Regal had that as an option or if they only did it in the Century.

Shift24 > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/20/2017 at 21:03

0

You are complaining about an interior like that from 1997? It’s not bad for it’s time. I’d daily that no problem because legendary 3.8L and very much a comfy sleeper. Do you want a reminder of other 1997 interiors?

Taurus

LHS

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Shift24 10/20/2017 at 21:08

0

Yeah I would rather drive the Regal than those.

Nibbles > fhrblig 10/20/2017 at 21:34

1

Century only

Chariotoflove > itschrome 10/20/2017 at 22:05

0

Oh my. That’s not pretentious at all.

HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles > itschrome 10/20/2017 at 22:49

0

I like it.

E92M3 > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/20/2017 at 23:34

3

If you look at a Honda and a GM interior from the 90's, it’s hard to believe they’re from the same decade.

415s30 W123TSXWaggoIIIIIIo ( •_•))°) > Dr. Zoidberg - RIP Oppo 10/21/2017 at 13:34

0

I came to say the same thing, great minds...

415s30 W123TSXWaggoIIIIIIo ( •_•))°) > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/21/2017 at 13:35

0

For sure interiors are a deal breaker on some cars for me, I mean you are IN there all the time.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > 415s30 W123TSXWaggoIIIIIIo ( •_•))°) 10/21/2017 at 15:17

0

Exactly, that’s why they’re much more of a deal-breaker for me than exterior styling. I’d drive a 1st gen Panamera despite it being hideous because the interior is so nice