who needs a Nissan Juke when you can have a Nissan Kicks

"pip bip - choose Corrour" (hhgttg69) 10/02/2017 at 05:33 • Filed to: nissan, kicks, not a Juke

1

6

:)

Svend > pip bip - choose Corrour 10/02/2017 at 06:08

0

As the Kick is replacing the Juke, deciding won’t be a problem.

Just as the Skoda Karoq is replacing the Yeti.

The Juke hs been losing ground and Nissan chose to go more mainstream, which isn’t necessarily bad as it’s bigger sister the Nissan QashQai is one of the most popular SUVs in Europe.

pip bip - choose Corrour > Svend 10/02/2017 at 06:12

0

ok, didn’t realise.

Fl1ngstam > Svend 10/02/2017 at 06:19

2

Kicks is not replacing the Juke. A new Juke is coming. Kicks is based on a lower-cost platform, mainly for developing markets like Brazil and India. However, it sells alongside the Juke in other places like the Middle East, and they both do OK out of it.

pip bip - choose Corrour > Fl1ngstam 10/02/2017 at 06:30

0

cheers

Svend > Fl1ngstam 10/02/2017 at 12:34

1

I’ve read so many places over the years it’s replacing the Juke but ye’, more recent car magazine articles say it’s replacing the Juke in some markets, will sit along side the Juke in others and won’t be offered at all to the remaining markets.

Svend > pip bip - choose Corrour 10/02/2017 at 12:37

1

As clarified with Fl1ngstam. News in car magazines since 2014 was that it’ll replace the Juke. As I stand corrected, it’ll replace the Juke in some markets, sit along side the Juke in others and won’t be offered at all in remaining markets.