![]() 07/12/2016 at 10:39 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Though Ttyymmnn may disagree...
![]() 07/12/2016 at 10:53 |
|
It looks better than anything with a Halo
![]() 07/12/2016 at 11:01 |
|
Looks better than the latest Indy cars.
![]() 07/12/2016 at 11:04 |
|
*thong
![]() 07/12/2016 at 11:09 |
|
I disagree! Yeah there have been more beautiful F1 cars, but that one is quite elegant. Not a fan of the fat air intake though.
![]() 07/12/2016 at 12:14 |
|
The only thing I like about these are that the wing comes straight out from the nose (rather than a hole), and that the area in front of the driver is sloped. Apart from that, these are UGLY, although I think that has to do with the massive, massive sidepods.
![]() 07/12/2016 at 12:23 |
|
Oh, I don’t know. That wing thing in the front of the Petronas car looks like it’s part of some alien invader’s costume.
![]() 07/12/2016 at 12:27 |
|
F1 is increasingly about aero these days, and the front wings are getting wild. The funny thing is when one of the end planes breaks off the million-dollar wing and the car continues on like nothing happened.
![]() 07/12/2016 at 12:29 |
|
The side pods are hideous. That said, some of the oval racing on the big tracks has been damned exciting. More so than F1 to be sure.
![]() 07/12/2016 at 12:50 |
|
There was a checkered flag photo of the Petronas car that got me started on this rant. I looked for another photo, which I posted above, to see what the hideous black growths were about. Bloody awful-looking, they are.
![]() 07/12/2016 at 13:33 |
|
Well you picked a terrible angle. In any universe they are much prettier than that hideous Indy car. Next year they should be better with a low wide rear wing and fat tires. I think they look pretty good, we are in modern times where we understand aero a lot more, the fact is pretty cars come from not understanding those things, we will never get cars like earlier ones again.
![]() 07/12/2016 at 14:30 |
|
Definitely not as bad as the dicknose 2014 cars.