![]() 07/10/2016 at 11:20 • Filed to: Goo-Net Showdown, Japan, Toyota Ipsum, Citroen Xsara Picasso, Volkswagen Golf Plus, Lancia Musa | ![]() | ![]() |
Welcome back to another Goo-Net Challenge, where I gather a selection of cars off of Goo-Net Exchange that fit a specific category, then put them in a poll for you guys to pick which one you would rather have.
Today, we’re going with compact MPVs from around the world. Well, specifically...Japan, France, Germany, and Italy.
We start with Japan, and this !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! .
Being a 240U means it’s equipped with the largest engine offered in the Ipsum, the 2.4 liter 2AZ-FE, which should be familiar to US Toyota enthusiasts, as it was offered in a number of vehicles here, including the original Scion tC, the final generation xB, and the last years of the Toyota Matrix and Pontiac Vibe.
The Ipsum and it’s other versions in other markets were available with 7 seats, but this Ipsum is only a 6 seater.
The G Selection models also come pretty well equipped, including navigation, alloy wheels, power windows, keyless entry, ABS, ESC, and a backup camera.
This specific Ipsum is listed with 116,000km/72,079 miles on it and is listed for 320,000 yen/$3,181.55.
Our next entry comes from France, a !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! .
The listing says it’s equipped with a 2 liter gasoline engine, though Wikipedia says such an engine was never offered in the Picasso, though a few different 2.0s were offered in the Xsara it was based off of, ranging from 123 to 164 hp.
The Xsara Picasso lacks a couple features that the Ipsum has, like navigation and a backup camera, but it does come equipped with a sunroof, something the Ipsum doesn’t have.
The Xsara Picasso also lacks a seat compared to the Toyota, as it’s only a 2-row with two seats up front, three in the second row, though those seats are easily removable to increase cargo space.
Listed with 88,000km/54,680 miles, this Picasso is also being sold for 480,000 yen/$4,772.32, making it not only older than the Ipsum and less equipped, but also more expensive.
Germany supplies us with our next competitor, the
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
Equipment-wise, this Golf Plus seems to fit somewhere between the Ipsum and the Picasso. No backup camera or fog lamps, but it has navigation and a sunroof.
What it also has is an engine that Wikipedia doesn’t list for the Golf Plus, a 2.0 FSI inline-4 gasoline engine.
Like the Citroen, the Golf Plus is only a 5 seater (2 up front, 3 in the second row).
The odometer reads 52,701km/32,746 miles, and is listed for 448,000 yen/$4,454.17, slotting it between the Ipsum and Xsara Picasso, but much closer to the Citroen than the Toyota, but also the one with the least on the odometer.
Finally, we go to Italy for our last contender, this
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
.
Yet again, the Ipsum has the upper hand on seating, the Musa also only seats 5 in the same arrangement as it’s other European competitors.
The Musa also comes undersized in the engine department, powered by only a 1.4 liter 8-valve FIRE engine, putting out only 77 horsepower (barely more than a US-spec Mitsubishi Mirage).
But, all of this size shortcomings, inside and out, also results in a smaller car that’s easier to park.
It has less on the odometer than all but the VW with 60,969km/37,884 miles but it’s not a cheap one.
It’s currently listed for 850,000 yen/$8,450.99, making it far more expensive than the others. You could buy the Ipsum and either the Golf Plus or Xsara Picasso for less than the price of this Lancia.
But...it is a more premium model from a more luxurious brand.
Now, this leaves a choice. Which would you rather choose?
The cheaper Toyota Ipsum that seats more and comes better equipped, but has more mileage on it?
The lesser equipped Citroen Xsara Picasso that’s also more expensive?
The Volkswagen Golf Plus GLI that’s well balanced on equipment, mileage, and price?
Or the pricey, underpowered, but small and efficient Lancia Musa?
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 07/10/2016 at 11:26 |
|
I’m biased so I’d take the Golf Plus. Ours looks identical to the one on Goo Net. Holy shit that price is insanely low for that mileage.
![]() 07/10/2016 at 11:42 |
|
I don’t like any of these, but I’ll take the Citroen.
Better parts availability (and parts price) than the Toyota, slightly less of a connection to the elderly as the Golf 55 plus and not too small like the overpriced Lancia. Plus, I bet it’s the same 2.0 liter engine my daily driver has. If it’s the same one it’s a good one that will certainly outlast the VW and the Lancia. These reach 400k+ with ease, if maintained.
And, honestly, who cares about factory navigation in a decade old vehicle? It’ll be horribly outdated and your phone based nav will be far superior.
![]() 07/10/2016 at 12:04 |
|
The Lancia is the only one with a NICE interior, so I take the overpriced, oversized Panda.
![]() 07/10/2016 at 12:15 |
|
Toyota makes the best cars, but that one doesn’t have a sunroof!
![]() 07/10/2016 at 13:05 |
|
I’d enjoy the Citroen most of the group, it has such charisma and character. I simply love the liberal usage of glass that lends the whole car the general feel of a conservatory although it’s a shame it doesn’t have a proper stick shift. It’s much comfier than the VW and more spacious than the Lancia, and the Toyota is simply outdated and looks it. The Picasso’s UFO-like looks are definitely controversial but I think it’s curiously endearing. It’s cheap, French, and cheerful, and that’s what I want from a mini-MPV!
![]() 07/10/2016 at 14:10 |
|
Never liked the Citroen or VW myself, mainly due to styling and materials. The Toyota is also a little too bland for me too.
So, that means I’m going for the Fiat Lancia . It’s a simple commuter car with a nice interior and not too many miles, so it’s good enough.
![]() 07/10/2016 at 14:38 |
|
Or rebranded Idea: