Who wants to play a game?

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
06/23/2016 at 15:53 • Filed to: None

It’s the Internet’s favorite game, Oppo included! Yes, of course, I’m talking about The Blame Game®!

One thing I will note is that it looks like the camera car was trying to stay left, but bounced off the curb. So whoever was or was not at fault here, I don’t think this was intentional. However, as this is The Blame Game®, someone is likely to disagree with me. Are you ready?

Then lets play THE BLAME GAME®!

DISCUSSION (16)

Dr. Zoidberg - RIP Oppo > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/23/2016 at 15:55

I blame the [insert minority group here] for all the [insert hot-button issue here] and also [something completely unrelated that might involve Nazis]

My citroen won't start > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/23/2016 at 15:57

Clearly the Doblo driver.

My hovercraft is full of eels > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/23/2016 at 16:03

Maybe one of them could have hit the brake. It was a bit like a game of chicken, and none of them won.

DynamicWeight > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/23/2016 at 16:03

So the camera driver cut off the van who was already in the circle? In that case, his fault for initiating the dangerous situation. Both people are too aggressive in this situation though.

Highlander-Datsuns are Forever > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/23/2016 at 16:06

It’s clearly Lewis Hamilton’s fault, Rosberg had the line.

Where have all the lightweights gone? > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/23/2016 at 16:06

The van 100% takes the blame. Clearly there was not enough room between it and the motorcycle, and the driver ultimately paid the price.

Urambo Tauro > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/23/2016 at 16:08

The camera’s view makes it hard to tell if the camera-car truly blocked the van’s merge, or if the van just tried to butt-in and cut the camera car off.

It’s good to see the van signalling, but as near as I can make out, right-of-way would probably rule in favor of the camera car here.

deekster_caddy > My hovercraft is full of eels
06/23/2016 at 16:10

I’m pretty sure in all rights of way laws if you are merging into another lane it’s your responsibility to have an opening. The little van should have done something different than just pushing over. Sped up, slowed down (way down), followed it’s lane to the right fork and turned around later... but not that.

e36Jeff now drives a ZHP > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/23/2016 at 16:12

Both did some stupid things, but I think the Van driver is to blame. It looks like he was trying to go straight from a turn only lane, the car has right of way, as its in the correct lane to go straight, the Van appears to be trying to intimidate the car out of the way. Had either of them just hit the brakes the whole thing would have been avoided.

MysticStick > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/23/2016 at 16:17

I blame whoever was laying on the horn button, they had enough time to do that really long horn-sounding like they were driving a container ship then they had enough time to stop and get out and think about what they were about to do next.

SidewaysOnDirt still misses Bowie > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/23/2016 at 16:26

#HamiltonsFault

SidewaysOnDirt still misses Bowie > Highlander-Datsuns are Forever
06/23/2016 at 16:27

Dammit, didn’t see this before posting #HamiltonsFault

Glad to see blaming Lewis for everything (because he’s black) is still totally a thing.

My hovercraft is full of eels > deekster_caddy
06/23/2016 at 17:00

Of course. What I mean is: in a situation like this, it’s better to drive defensively. I’d rather let the other guy have his way than end up in a collision.

CaptainSlower > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/23/2016 at 17:05

The whole thing was caused by the dude on the crotch-rocket, obvs.

Rabble rabble, four wheels good, two wheels bad, rabble rabble.

Desu-San-Desu > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/24/2016 at 11:34

“Blame all humans!” - The tree that got hit.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Desu-San-Desu
06/24/2016 at 11:35

This