Found in my owner's manual

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 06/03/2016 at 17:58 • Filed to: None

3

9

This is the graphic explaining the little information read out between the tach and the speedometer. They could have picked any number under 35... and that’s the one they went with?

E90M3 > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/03/2016 at 18:09

7

You’re right, they should’ve gone with 6.9

Out, but with a W - has found the answer > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/03/2016 at 18:09

2

Well, they clearly don’t want to overstate its mileage too much.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > E90M3 06/03/2016 at 18:15

4

Why, is 420 mpg just too ridiculous?

E90M3 > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/03/2016 at 18:18

7

Bro, that kind of mileage is just too high to be believable

Dr. Zoidberg - RIP Oppo > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/03/2016 at 21:30

1

I think the bigger lie is the fact that it’s “OK”

Eric @ opposite-lock.com > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/03/2016 at 23:32

0

What car is this?

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Eric @ opposite-lock.com 06/03/2016 at 23:39

0

Audi A8L

Eric @ opposite-lock.com > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/03/2016 at 23:40

0

Sounds like a pretty accurate estimate, then.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Eric @ opposite-lock.com 06/03/2016 at 23:41

0

If you put a 1 in front of it.