![]() 05/18/2016 at 17:28 • Filed to: For Sweden bait | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() 05/18/2016 at 17:30 |
|
I live right next to Lunken. Also, I get creeped out when I see local-to-me references on big online communities.
‘tis all.
![]() 05/18/2016 at 17:31 |
|
Ford TriMotor!
![]() 05/18/2016 at 17:36 |
|
That was my first instinct ... I have no idea why I know what it is.
![]() 05/18/2016 at 17:37 |
|
Maybe the three motors are a distinctive feature of the TriMotor
![]() 05/18/2016 at 17:42 |
|
The Fokker F.VII looked somewhat similar when equipped with three engines:
I don’t believe any of those survived though.
![]() 05/18/2016 at 17:44 |
|
A couple of years ago, this aircraft came to a car/air show in Georgetown, just north of Austin. I took quite a few pictures of it, and you can see them here.
https://tshaff.smugmug.com/Aviation/Ford-…
![]() 05/18/2016 at 17:44 |
|
Might be ... I just remember seeing photos of it in junior high and realizing it was important for some reason.
![]() 05/18/2016 at 17:50 |
|
Water Fokker > Air Fokkers
![]() 05/18/2016 at 17:53 |
|
Except that the Trimotor was all-metal (aluminum), whereas the Fokker was constructed as a fabric-covered steel-tube fuselage and had a wing made of wood. Ford claimed that his use of metal for the fuselage made it the “safest airliner around.” The Trimotor also borrowed so heavily from earlier Junkers designs that Junkers sued Ford and won (Ford lost a countersuit), which meant that Ford was not allowed to market his Trimotor in Europe.
![]() 05/18/2016 at 18:43 |
|
Fascinating aircraft. There’s an old video somewhere of one of these doing a loop.
![]() 05/18/2016 at 20:35 |
|
.