"Cherry_man1" (Cherry_man1)
12/31/2016 at 01:05 • Filed to: Coyote Ranchero, Ranchero, Ford, Coyote Swap | 0 | 15 |
This guy in the Torino Forums is taking this:
and Putting these in it:
That’s right....a Coyote 5.0L and a Built trans in a Ranchero
If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
> Cherry_man1
12/31/2016 at 01:14 | 1 |
God 1973 was such a horrible year for car styling.
Cherry_man1
> If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
12/31/2016 at 01:17 | 5 |
Say what now?
If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
> Cherry_man1
12/31/2016 at 01:20 | 1 |
Park bench bumpers, bro
S65
> Cherry_man1
12/31/2016 at 01:22 | 0 |
He better keep it ratty
Sweet Trav
> Cherry_man1
12/31/2016 at 01:30 | 2 |
Would be 1000x better with a 3.5l Ecoboost. Coyote motors are junk.
Birddog
> Cherry_man1
12/31/2016 at 01:31 | 2 |
Jeez! That reminds me. There’s a 73 Ranchero twin to your Torino by my shop. I gotta get a pic.
Phatboyphil
> S65
12/31/2016 at 01:32 | 0 |
Nah, only half as ratty.
Birddog
> If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
12/31/2016 at 01:32 | 2 |
Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder.
Cherry_man1
> If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
12/31/2016 at 02:36 | 0 |
Not quire a big as you think on the Gran Torino.
Cherry_man1
> Sweet Trav
12/31/2016 at 02:37 | 2 |
Not really. They are miles better then other V8s in it’s class.
19JRC99
> If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
12/31/2016 at 03:30 | 0 |
Out. Now.
(Okay, it was technically styling from 1970. Don’t care.)
vondon302
> Sweet Trav
12/31/2016 at 08:31 | 0 |
Yup ford road runner is where its at.
;)
Frenchlicker
> Sweet Trav
12/31/2016 at 09:59 | 0 |
I won’t agree with the second part but I will agree with the first. Mainly because I want those swaps to be so common everything to be cheaper.
Hateful Mate
> If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
12/31/2016 at 14:00 | 0 |
Not really.
Sweet Trav
> Cherry_man1
12/31/2016 at 16:07 | 1 |
Nope.