![]() 12/29/2016 at 04:45 • Filed to: Duelo, Overnighted from Japan, Mitusbishi Lancer Evolution X FQ-440 MR, Ford Focus RS | ![]() | ![]() |
One is dead, technically, but has 440 hp and a rally-tested 4WD system. The other is made of Monster, Block and fury, the stuff bros are made of. Which side are you on?
![]() 12/29/2016 at 04:59 |
|
![]() 12/29/2016 at 05:05 |
|
Evo.
![]() 12/29/2016 at 05:07 |
|
I’ll take the Mitsu. I want the Ford but I can’t help but see five different designers arguing over a final “face”. It’s a frigging mess!
![]() 12/29/2016 at 05:23 |
|
The RS if I had to DD it. The evo if i can make it a harsh track monster.
![]() 12/29/2016 at 05:33 |
|
Lancer is the answer.
![]() 12/29/2016 at 08:15 |
|
Evo
Ford needs to fire its designers and hire new ones.
![]() 12/29/2016 at 09:32 |
|
Hmm, mind numbing turbo lag or really really bad rear quarter blind spots?
Ford all day erryday.
![]() 12/29/2016 at 09:35 |
|
I’ll take a WRX thank you very much.
![]() 12/29/2016 at 09:42 |
|
Not much of a question, really.
![]() 12/29/2016 at 09:49 |
|
But which WRX?
![]() 12/29/2016 at 09:50 |
|
I thought so, too. Between the two, it’s the EVO that aged better, or is aging better.
![]() 12/29/2016 at 09:51 |
|
Ow.
![]() 12/29/2016 at 09:51 |
|
Me, too.
![]() 12/29/2016 at 09:51 |
|
![]() 12/29/2016 at 09:53 |
|
Checks out.
![]() 12/29/2016 at 09:53 |
|
![]() 12/29/2016 at 10:52 |
|
Evo.
Yes, reliability blah blah. But it at least looks like a sedan while the focus looks like an angry fish
![]() 12/29/2016 at 11:29 |
|
The comments on this post are basically just proof that the Evo needed nothing but an interior/tech upgrade. Some cars are just so good that you could practically keep making them forever.