Consumers Love This Advice - Number 1 Will Shock You!

"Amoore100" (amoore100) 12/12/2016 at 01:10 • Filed to: Clickbait, lists, MSN

2

37

!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! What the actual hell, MSN. Possibly the single worst list in the entire history of internet lists.

Savor the awfulness

DC3 LS, will be perpetually replacing cars until the end of time > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 01:20

1

It’s not even click bait. Number one really will shock you ROFL.

Also Honda>MB. I’m dead XD

Eric @ opposite-lock.com > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 01:27

3

This makes no sense. Chevy does not have nicer interiors than Ford, let alone VW, yet they’re not even on the list. Toyota should be way up there, too (the Camry is really nice). Although I’m not a fan of BMW, I have no clue how the cars on this list beat them out on their interiors.

It’s interesting that this list is mostly ties for 2nd, 7th, and 10th, meaning most makes have nice interiors.

promoted by the color red > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 01:29

7

Is it really a ranked list when half the things on it are tied with each other?

Tazio, Count Fouroff > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 01:36

3

List made by someone who has no clue and who had to come up with some kind of copy for his/her editor by the deadline

How it strikes me, anyway. Totally agree it’s outrageous =P

Amoore100 > promoted by the color red 12/12/2016 at 01:40

1

I found myself questioning that along with my entire existence.

Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 01:41

5

Am I the only one whose shocked that MSN is still around?

Amoore100 > Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero 12/12/2016 at 01:44

0

no

Tristan > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 02:05

1

*Paid for by FCA.

flyingmetalbird > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 02:13

2

Volvo blows everyone else out of the water interior wise. Followed by Mercedes and Honda IMO.

This isn’t even a bad list. It’s kinda just a wrong list. I bet the person who made it was far from a car enthusiast

Amoore100 > flyingmetalbird 12/12/2016 at 02:24

3

Having been in newish FCA products, I can report that this person probably was far from being a human. Probably just a robot that calculates results based on an algorithm that generates random names.

GM once used that. It created the Allante and the Sintra. That’s why we don’t use it anymore.

pip bip - choose Corrour > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 02:27

1

nothing but pure clickbait!

no1 is correct if you’re Stevie Wonder with prosthetic limbs.

jimz > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 05:23

0

The interior pic you posted was from 2007 and ceased to exist after 2010.

LongbowMkII > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 06:05

0

It’s easy to have a good average when you have two cars. The 200c isn’t dragging them down. I could see a top spec 300 and Pacifica getting high marks.

Dave the car guy , still here > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 08:28

1

It still survives because of NBC. Yahoo news is even worse, with its many links to fake news, even worse lists and many malware laden sites.

V12 Jake- Hittin' Switches > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 08:41

1

While I agree with where Volvo placed, Mercedes really should have been first...and why is Chrysler even in the top 10.

RT > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 08:57

1

11. Hyundai

10. Chevrolet

7. Mercedes Benz

But obviously tied with Honda (not even Acura)

And also tied with Volvo

2. Kia

Again, obviously tied with Porsche

And Tesla

And Audi

And …GMC???

None of that matters anyway though, because all are beaten by the true number 1. Chrysler

MSN, I would be lost without you.

Vicente Esteve > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 09:19

1

It’s not like those interiors aren’t nice, but a Canyon?

Amoore100 > jimz 12/12/2016 at 09:28

0

It says “11 Brands with the Nicest Interiors”. I see “new” mentioned nowhere.

Amoore100 > LongbowMkII 12/12/2016 at 09:37

0

vs

Amoore100 > V12 Jake- Hittin' Switches 12/12/2016 at 09:39

0

Indeed. Or Tesla for that matter. I get that it’s high tech and all, but could it get any more depressing...

Amoore100 > RT 12/12/2016 at 09:40

1

Oh god, I laughed so hard I’m dyin. Thanks for that. Still, Vo’ needs something more sumptuous yet angular...

V12 Jake- Hittin' Switches > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 09:41

1

It’s high tech but pretty low quality.

RT > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 09:42

1

Tied with Mercedes-Benz because of the godly heaters alone.

LongbowMkII > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 09:48

0

Needs more quilting?

Amoore100 > Vicente Esteve 12/12/2016 at 09:50

0

Pacifica?

Sure it’s nice, but it’s not even close to anything else...

Amoore100 > Eric @ opposite-lock.com 12/12/2016 at 09:53

1

Yep, Chevy interiors are kind of disgusting IMO

Although I don’t mean to be a downer, Toyota interiors may look good but quality has gone way south. I was in a new Sienna and then a recent Prius and the plastics felt like they were made of Easter egg shells. Also, all the fake wood.

BMW’s are nice but getting quite dated nowadays

Amoore100 > DC3 LS, will be perpetually replacing cars until the end of time 12/12/2016 at 09:54

0

Oh yeah, the Tesla is sooo much better...

Amoore100 > Tazio, Count Fouroff 12/12/2016 at 09:55

0

It’s just awful. Every damn time.

Amoore100 > V12 Jake- Hittin' Switches 12/12/2016 at 09:56

0

Yep. It couldn’t look cheaper if they tried...oh wait, they just tried...

Blargggggghhhhh

V12 Jake- Hittin' Switches > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 10:07

1

*vommits

Amoore100 > LongbowMkII 12/12/2016 at 10:09

0

How about first a large touchscreen from 2017? That’s a good start, now some gauges that don’t look like they’re from a freakish carnival but actually belong in a $40K sedan. Better materials for sure that are actually soft-touch, not fricken egg shells. Oh, and actual interior design would help instead of just putting things in places. There’s no cohesion, everything appears separate whereas there’s running motifs in the Merc, Vo, and Kia. Better wood, too.

LongbowMkII > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 10:25

0

touchscreens are garbage. look at those merc gauges. look at them.

Amoore100 > LongbowMkII 12/12/2016 at 10:58

0

They’re lovely digital gauges rendered in sophisticated and subdued colors? Anyways, I’m not trying to say the Chrysler interiors are shit, just that they don’t deserve being compared to the much better options out there. They still beat Chevy IMO.

Vicente Esteve > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 12:22

1

Compared to those, absolutely. This doesn’t make much sense.

LongbowMkII > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 13:49

0

They look like gt2 era video game displays

Eric @ opposite-lock.com > Amoore100 12/12/2016 at 18:56

0

Chevy constantly amazes me with how they have apparently never learned. Their interiors still look like they were designed/constructed in the 90s. I mean, that Volt interior could be transplanted in a late-90s Cavalier and after about 15 or so years of wear, nobody would be able to tell it wasn’t original. Their panels are still hard plastic, don’t fit well, and show flashing around the edges, for crying out loud!

I think it might have been the last-gen Camry that impressed me. It was so nice that it seemed like a much pricier car. I haven’t been in one in a while, the last was the rear seat of a 2013-ish base Prius C in the dark, so I didn’t really get a sense of it.

Is there really that much you can do to a traditional car interior to make it nicer? If it hides all the airbags, looks, and feels good, does it matter how old it is? Is it possible to call the interior on that Chrysler better with a straight face?

That said, I do actually like the interiors of the other German makes better, but that’s more ergonomics than appearance or quality. I hate all the tacked-on screens wherever they’re found.

Amoore100 > Eric @ opposite-lock.com 12/12/2016 at 20:21

0

I don’t know man...maybe American car buyers enjoy having interiors that look like they’ve melted prematurely? Sure seems that way.

I think the trouble with Toyota is that they tried just hard enough to make it seem fresh and new but the materials belie an inherent lack of quality. I too concur that Camries used to be tanks; my grandparents have an ‘05 V6 and all interior surfaces are still smooth and feel like they did on day one. On the other hand, I’ve been shuttled in contemporary ‘yotas (~12 Prius and ~15 Sienna) where the new plastic texturing meant to mimic rice paper or whatever just feels chintzy and hollow. Also, the sharp angles like how the Sienna’s dash is demarcated by separate districts kind of gives the feeling that it was thrown together by a committee rather than actually designed .

Anyways, I don’t really have a bone to pick with BMW’s interiors other than that they’re not very friendly. Many buttons and no touch screen? Sumptuous but confounding.