NPoCP?

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 11/09/2016 at 17:36 • Filed to: None

1

19

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!

TysMagic > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/09/2016 at 17:42

1

shopping that in other site, seems to be a pretty solid np comparatively.
I think it’s a good choice if you can do the Doug warranty with it

EL_ULY > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/09/2016 at 17:44

2

waaaant!

Steve in Manhattan > TysMagic 11/09/2016 at 17:46

1

Usually if the car is more than 10 years old they won’t do a warrior.

TysMagic > Steve in Manhattan 11/09/2016 at 17:47

0

yep, that’s what I was thinking - and I hope warrior wasn’t a typo

jkm7680 > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/09/2016 at 17:55

0

Np. But it will likely be bought by somebody who can’t afford to maintain it.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > jkm7680 11/09/2016 at 17:57

4

Three years down the road it might (fingers crossed) be bought by me.

What I’m saying is, you are correct.

OPPOsaurus WRX > jkm7680 11/09/2016 at 18:30

0

Why u looking at me stop lookin at me

jkm7680 > OPPOsaurus WRX 11/09/2016 at 18:43

0

no u looking at me you stop that

QCGoose > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/09/2016 at 20:45

1

Lovely cars. My grandpa had an ‘03 Arnage R for a few years and the car was just lovely. Comfortable, powerful, and just full of charm. A perfect cruiser. He regrets selling it.

On the other hand, he also had an ‘05 Continental GT, and as much as I liked it, he hated it. Nothing but problems and they were always expensive no matter how small. He regrets ever buying it.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > QCGoose 11/09/2016 at 20:58

0

Interesting. So you would say that the Arnage was more reliable than the continental?

JR1 > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/09/2016 at 21:08

1

Eh CP. Car could be free. Maintence costs are far too high

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > JR1 11/09/2016 at 21:24

0

BUT LOOK AT IT!

JR1 > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/09/2016 at 22:15

0

... It is pretty wonderful but for 21k there are better ways to be stupid with your money

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > JR1 11/09/2016 at 22:38

0

Name one that is a car

QCGoose > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/09/2016 at 23:15

1

I can’t speak for all of them, but of his two Bentleys, the Arnage was Camry-reliable compared to the Continental.

Steve in Manhattan > TysMagic 11/09/2016 at 23:54

1

Nope - it was fucking autocorrect ... WARRANTY was the word I was looking for.

JR1 > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/10/2016 at 12:13

0

Flashy, luxurious, and unreliable (just like the Bentley)

http://m.ebay.com/itm/152308810045?_trkparms=pageci:82809151-a768-11e6-af2d-005056bb1838%7Cparentrq:4f37ae001580a7854626ed12fffe6b67%7Ciid:20&_mwBanner=1

Flashier, luxurious, more reliable

https://www.hemmings.com/classifieds/dealer/cadillac/62/1881082.html

Still pretty flashy, maybe more luxurious, and far more reliable

http://m.ebay.com/itm/162273000347?_trkparms=pageci:dbc7a3e8-a768-11e6-b141-74dbd18032fc%7Cparentrq:4f39f71f1580a605b83afee7fffece76%7Ciid:8&_mwBanner=1

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > JR1 11/10/2016 at 12:15

0

The Caddy and Benz are cool, but I think I still like the Bentley better.

JR1 > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/10/2016 at 12:21

1

https://www.hemmings.com/classifieds/dealer/pierce-arrow/80/1765589.html#&gid=1&pid=11

Overbudget but more stately and it looks like you have more money.