Your Incoherent Internet Comment of the Day

Kinja'd!!! "ttyymmnn" (ttyymmnn)
08/12/2015 at 08:26 • Filed to: None

Kinja'd!!!7 Kinja'd!!! 12

Today’s incoherent Internet comment comes from The Independent, following a !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! about an archaeologist who believes he has discovered the final resting place of Queen Nefertiti in a hidden chamber inside King Tut’s tomb.

A bunch of German and Arabian tourist exploiters have you all wrapped up in silk roads and other convenient gangster killings of poor locals stuffed in old caves and new cut rock and you still cannot see for the desert dust, the place erodes like crazy without water and with water a while ago and many hammering old Fraudulent Goats it would hardly be as it now. Think some Geomorphology for God’s sake. Museums will pay for any old Iraqi artefact they can claim it was worth killing the Navy in Malvinas to invent a story around.

This has been your incoherent Internet comment of the day.


DISCUSSION (12)


Kinja'd!!! CalzoneGolem > ttyymmnn
08/12/2015 at 08:32

Kinja'd!!!2

I ... uh ... what?


Kinja'd!!! Smallbear wants a modern Syclone, local Maple Leafs spammer > ttyymmnn
08/12/2015 at 08:32

Kinja'd!!!2

But if you add water then it doesn’t as it was many years ago when it wasn’t without. Of course things are

Meh. I was trying to add more incoherence, but I can’t even. I give up.


Kinja'd!!! ttyymmnn > Smallbear wants a modern Syclone, local Maple Leafs spammer
08/12/2015 at 08:34

Kinja'd!!!1

I think it’s a lost cause.


Kinja'd!!! ttyymmnn > CalzoneGolem
08/12/2015 at 08:34

Kinja'd!!!1

Exactly.


Kinja'd!!! pip bip - choose Corrour > ttyymmnn
08/12/2015 at 08:35

Kinja'd!!!1

my brain hurts now.


Kinja'd!!! PS9 > ttyymmnn
08/12/2015 at 08:38

Kinja'd!!!1

How is babby formed?


Kinja'd!!! ttyymmnn > PS9
08/12/2015 at 08:40

Kinja'd!!!2

By hammering old Fraudulent Goats, apparently.


Kinja'd!!! extraspecialbitter > ttyymmnn
08/12/2015 at 08:56

Kinja'd!!!1

This will be my new lorem ipsum for all the things.


Kinja'd!!! SnapUndersteer, Italian Spiderman > ttyymmnn
08/12/2015 at 09:06

Kinja'd!!!1

Geomorphology is where it’s at


Kinja'd!!! RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht > ttyymmnn
08/12/2015 at 09:49

Kinja'd!!!0

The final sentence provides a valuable clue in “Malvinas”: English as not-first language and Latin American with an anti-”imperialism” kick and conspiracy nut complex. Trying for a translation from garble to loonie:

“A bunch of German and Arabian tourism types (who engage in exploitation of local peoples) have surrounded this issue with historical romance to pull the wool over your eyes and pass off recent killings as ones from antiquity. These tombs are in freshly cut rock that wouldn’t be this pristine even without water erosion, and with exposure to rain and local wildlife such as goats wouldn’t be in a fraction this good condition. Geomorphology and erosion rates support my insane claim. Museums will pay for anything they can pass off as an artifact - even recently looted from Iraq! - and to conceal this kind of conspiracy or to further imperialist ambitions like this (not sure about this part) they are willing to secretly press for wars on falsified basis such as the one in LAS MALVINAS (Falklands).”

Whether he believes the imperialist attitudes and conspiracies were the main reason for war in the Falklands or he thinks there’s something more convoluted going on re: Falklands history and falsified historical records(!) “just like this”, or that Argentine navy personnel were used to substitute for historical war dead(!!), I’m not sure. I suspect LAS MALVINAS tie into every Argentine conspiracy theory that exists in some way, because why would Britain resist a land grab unless THEY HAD SOMETHING TO HIDE. LaRouchies only wish they were this crazy.


Kinja'd!!! Racescort666 > RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
08/12/2015 at 10:17

Kinja'd!!!0

And I thought the conspiracy theory nuts were hard to understand when they are native English speakers.


Kinja'd!!! RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht > Racescort666
08/12/2015 at 10:34

Kinja'd!!!0

There was, in the 1920s and somewhat before, a cottage industry in the looting of mummies and the faking of mummies. The discovery of a possible extra chamber to an existing documented tomb, to be excavated *under the public eye* has about as much to do with this as the warmth of a tea cozy used as a hat - but our friend here believes otherwise.