![]() 04/30/2015 at 23:06 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
the interwebz doesn’t give an exact answer
![]() 04/30/2015 at 23:14 |
|
Ehh, kind of? In the spiritual sense I guess it would be.
![]() 04/30/2015 at 23:21 |
|
I need an exact answer. If anything, i feel it more to the 550, 575, 599 and the F12
![]() 04/30/2015 at 23:24 |
|
I agree. The 288 was a homologation special built for the public that never raced in its intended series. The 250 GTO was a purpose built sports car that happened to be sold to the public under the pretense of homologation.
![]() 04/30/2015 at 23:30 |
|
In that case, it’s not a predecesor.
![]() 04/30/2015 at 23:36 |
|
Who’s to say really? How can a mid engine TT V8 be a direct replacement for a front engine V12? In spirit, as the top tier racing Ferrari of the time, it certainly is the predecessor.
![]() 04/30/2015 at 23:39 |
|
Not really. I mean, it shares a name, but the lineage doesn’t really match up that way. To me, there’s not really a predecessor to the 288. Sure, it’s related to the 308, but not in a way of “evolution” but a way of “modification”, for lack of a better term.
![]() 04/30/2015 at 23:45 |
|
Not a predecessor. The 250 GTO was the predecessor to the 330 in it’s various forms. The 288 GTO was a return to limited series cars- the first since the 365 California. It’s body style closely resembles the 308GTS/GTB.
![]() 04/30/2015 at 23:49 |
|
I think you are right. It started the whole flagship of the line recipe
![]() 04/30/2015 at 23:51 |
|
Great input, noted sir
![]() 04/30/2015 at 23:52 |
|
Racing and production are 2 different things here since the 288 and above never competed. If it were the case, the 250LM would be more of a candidate.
![]() 05/01/2015 at 00:15 |
|
No problem. I had to write a paper on Ferrari for my Italian Design final paper. Glad someone else could put the info to use!