Not all Edsels were unattractive 

Kinja'd!!! "JR1" (type35bugatti)
04/22/2015 at 22:14 • Filed to: Edsel

Kinja'd!!!8 Kinja'd!!! 8
Kinja'd!!!

In fact some such as this 1960 Edsel Ranger were down right beautiful


DISCUSSION (8)


Kinja'd!!! Velocity- Peuguette Connoisseur > JR1
04/22/2015 at 22:18

Kinja'd!!!0

That’s an Edsel? Dang, no one ever talks about these. That’s gorgeous.


Kinja'd!!! JR1 > Velocity- Peuguette Connoisseur
04/22/2015 at 22:26

Kinja'd!!!0

Kinja'd!!!

Fords biggest mistake. That was the Edsel. It it’s own brand available from 58-60 and the sales tanked so bad they discounted the company. It fit between Mercury and Ford in the brand lineup.

The 1960 Ranger you are looking at in the original post only sold roughly 2,500 cars because of the “vagina” 58/59 Edsel


Kinja'd!!! Velocity- Peuguette Connoisseur > JR1
04/22/2015 at 22:27

Kinja'd!!!0

Nah I knew about the ugly ones, I just never knew they were able to make something pretty before they ceased to exist!


Kinja'd!!! The Opponaut formerly known as MattP123 > JR1
04/22/2015 at 22:28

Kinja'd!!!1

The 2007 Edsel b9 Tribeca was pretty bad...

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! JR1 > Velocity- Peuguette Connoisseur
04/22/2015 at 22:29

Kinja'd!!!1

Like I said sales were so bad that there are largely forgotten. Shame really


Kinja'd!!! JR1 > The Opponaut formerly known as MattP123
04/22/2015 at 22:32

Kinja'd!!!0

Yuck. yuck, yuck


Kinja'd!!! Gonemad > JR1
04/23/2015 at 09:11

Kinja'd!!!0

Yeah well, some cars had toilet seats in the grille and didn’t turn out so bad.

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! JR1 > Gonemad
04/23/2015 at 09:13

Kinja'd!!!1

That is debatable. It looked good on a Type 35. Very though I am not so sure