"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
04/13/2015 at 22:14 • Filed to: None | 0 | 6 |
The more I think about it, the more I think my car would look good tastefully lowered.
Alex from Toronto
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/13/2015 at 22:18 | 2 |
I'm ok with this.
If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/13/2015 at 22:19 | 1 |
Yes as long as you keep a decent sidewall profile. At least double whatever the pictured car has would be good.
wafflesnfalafel
> If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
04/13/2015 at 22:23 | 0 |
agree - don't make it ride/handle like crap just to get a little more stance
If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
> wafflesnfalafel
04/13/2015 at 22:26 | 1 |
Wheels like that look like crap. All teeth and no gums.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> wafflesnfalafel
04/13/2015 at 22:34 | 0 |
I'd go for bagging if I was going to, that way I could raise it back up to drive it. My car rides too low as it is, I've already smashed the damn front off.
Dunnik
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/14/2015 at 00:50 | 1 |