![]() 04/10/2015 at 06:23 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
So, I've had the unique privilege of having two different commutes that are about the same length. My current commute is a mix of light city driving and cruising at around 55mph. The previous commute was a mix of light city driving and cruising at around 80mph. Both commutes were between 25 and 30 miles each way.
The average of 7 months of the 80mph commute: 31.88mpg
The average of 13 months of the 55mph commute: 33.44mpg
![]() 04/10/2015 at 06:35 |
|
My 1.2 Twingo barely does better than that. The thing is at huge revs at 80-85mph so it only gets about 35mpg. I should maybe slow down a little...
![]() 04/10/2015 at 06:45 |
|
This past week Ive gotten 100 miles to a 1/4 of a tank in my Ranger. Thats just about 25mpg. Considering its the 4.0L, thats impressive. I got that MPG by laying off the throttle as much as I can, but its taken every bit of self control I have to do that. Its hard to drive for economy when you know that if you just punch it a little it'll take off like a bat outta hell.
I miss that bat, he was fun.
![]() 04/10/2015 at 07:11 |
|
It's always been like that... FYI a C7 Corvette that has a 6.2L V8 will do 33mpg on the highway...
A C4 Lt1 Corvette with a 5.7L V8 that is over 20 years old will do 29mpg...
Economical cars are ridiuclous. A small engine does not necessarily gets better gas mileage, especially if it has to rev at 4500rpm to cruise a 80mph.
![]() 04/10/2015 at 08:28 |
|
When I had my 93 Explorer the best I could ever muster was 16mpg, so that is seriously impressive.
![]() 04/10/2015 at 09:29 |
|
Am I alone in thinking that the gear ratio's too short? I'd like to drop about 1000 revs on the highway.
![]() 04/10/2015 at 11:29 |
|
Yeah this is the thing, if I keep it around 2000rpm (and therefore around 65-70mph) it'll pull about 55mpg. Staying at that speed is pretty crappy though, so when you speed up a bit economy nose dives. For long distance driving a bigger engine is often better.