WWYR: Black Sedans Edition

Kinja'd!!! "sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
02/22/2015 at 10:10 • Filed to: None

Kinja'd!!!2 Kinja'd!!! 21
Kinja'd!!!

I found these two loitering at the edge of a mall parking lot. On the left, we have a 2014 Ford Taurus SHO, and on the right a 2014 Audi S4. Both of these cars are all-wheel drive, forced induction V6 sedans, and both go from 0-60 in 5.1 seconds. This is where the similarities end. The Ford is a big, comfy cruiser which costs between $35-42k depending on how optioned, and uses a 365hp twin-turbo Ecoboost V6 to lug its 4400lb. mass around. The smaller Audi is more of a corner-carver, and because it weighs just 3700lbs, it matches the Ford's performance with just 329hp from a supercharged V6. It will also cost you at least ten grand more than the Ford. Which would you put in your driveway?


DISCUSSION (21)


Kinja'd!!! Coty > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/22/2015 at 10:14

Kinja'd!!!0

Audi is probably the only one I'd fit inside.


Kinja'd!!! jkm7680 > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/22/2015 at 10:16

Kinja'd!!!2

S4. Much nicer inside IMO, might be manual, plus I'm loyal to Audi.


Kinja'd!!! E. Julius > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/22/2015 at 10:17

Kinja'd!!!2

Ooh tough one. Ever since I drove a new Taurus I've really had a thing for them. For some reason I just felt great behind the wheel and loved every minute, and it wasn't even an SHO. I also have a very slight American bias as a Michigander, but by no means am I a buy American zealot. On the other hand, I much prefer smaller, lighters cars to bigger cars, so I feel like I might have more fun with the Audi. I think I would have to take them both on an extended test drive to be absolutely sure.


Kinja'd!!! vdub_nut: scooter snob > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/22/2015 at 10:18

Kinja'd!!!3

Kinja'd!!!

because it's not a taurus.


Kinja'd!!! nafsucof > Coty
02/22/2015 at 10:19

Kinja'd!!!0

don't follow?


Kinja'd!!! sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Coty
02/22/2015 at 10:20

Kinja'd!!!0

Huh? The Ford is much bigger.


Kinja'd!!! sm70- why not Duesenberg? > jkm7680
02/22/2015 at 10:20

Kinja'd!!!0

Agreed on all points.


Kinja'd!!! Coty > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/22/2015 at 10:21

Kinja'd!!!1

Outside .


Kinja'd!!! djmt1 > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/22/2015 at 10:22

Kinja'd!!!1

Audi. I love their interiors.


Kinja'd!!! sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Coty
02/22/2015 at 10:25

Kinja'd!!!0

It also has the bigger interior, 122 Cubic feet to the Audi's 103.


Kinja'd!!! Coty > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/22/2015 at 10:28

Kinja'd!!!1

I dunno where it comes from but it's not the space in front of my knees. I'm not even tall and my knees are like on the dash.


Kinja'd!!! shop-teacher > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/22/2015 at 10:30

Kinja'd!!!1

The Taurus's interior may be big in volume, but it's actually rather cramped inside. I haven't say in an S4, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was just as comfortable behind the wheel.


Kinja'd!!! EL_ULY > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/22/2015 at 10:34

Kinja'd!!!0

SHO!!!


Kinja'd!!! sm70- why not Duesenberg? > EL_ULY
02/22/2015 at 10:38

Kinja'd!!!0

Our first vote for the Ford! Which surprises the hell out of me given how value-oriented Opponaunts usually are.


Kinja'd!!! Jonathan Harper > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/22/2015 at 10:44

Kinja'd!!!1

Mmm S4 with aggressive snow tires.


Kinja'd!!! EL_ULY > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/22/2015 at 10:54

Kinja'd!!!1

the S4 just doesn't do anything for me. Inside and out is meh at best. That particular car reminds me of so many gym bros lol :] The SHO on the other hand is such a good product that Ford thankfully decided release. It's a SHO!! Legend in my day. It also gives me that police interceptor feel. Ecoboost, AWD, and that sleek and aggressive exterior.


Kinja'd!!! Logansteno: Bought a VW? > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/22/2015 at 11:03

Kinja'd!!!1

SHO plz


Kinja'd!!! Tuned-Port-Injected-Rage > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/22/2015 at 11:18

Kinja'd!!!1

Hate the look of the new Taurus, and the S4 looks fantastic. Not to mention, the S4 has a much nicer interior. So, definitely the Audi.


Kinja'd!!! Renescent > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/22/2015 at 11:28

Kinja'd!!!1

SHO, not sure why... had a 94 SHO, maybe that's it... but it's fat and comfortable and fast.


Kinja'd!!! Jordan and the Slowrunner, Boomer Intensifies > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/22/2015 at 11:34

Kinja'd!!!1

The Taurus looks like a nice highway bomber, and since currently that's what I'm surrounded by, I'll take the SHO. If you ask me in June when I only live a couple hours from the Blue Ridge Parkway, ask me again, it will probably change.


Kinja'd!!! breakbread > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/22/2015 at 12:19

Kinja'd!!!1

The Taurus is HUGE. I used to think it was large when I'd roll up next to one in my Integra. But even in my MZ3 it's still just a monstrous sedan.

What the world needs is a Fusion ST/RS.