The new M4 is much better looking than the car it replaces.

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 02/21/2015 at 15:55 • Filed to: None

0

27

Especially in this color, and with these aftermarket wheels. Also, in before "Something something tire pressures something hurr-durr."

Smoggi - powered by 3 cylinders > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/21/2015 at 15:58

2

To me the Sedan always looked better on the M3. Shame that they didn't build an E46 M3 Sedan :/

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Smoggi - powered by 3 cylinders 02/21/2015 at 16:01

0

The sedan is also fookin' awesome:

Jordan and the Slowrunner, Boomer Intensifies > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/21/2015 at 16:05

1

Sakhir Orange!

TheElephant > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/21/2015 at 16:06

0

I don't know if it is the angle, or if that rear offset is wrong but it looks like it is just a few millimeters over being flush with the body, which really bothers me for some reason.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > TheElephant 02/21/2015 at 16:14

0

The wheels may stick out a *tiny* bit, but it's mostly the camera angle.

MysticStick > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/21/2015 at 16:19

0

Nice looks indeed. But is the I6 turbo better than the V8 in the car it replaces?

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > MysticStick 02/21/2015 at 16:23

0

From what I've heard, it is. But some people hate it and think it's a worse engine because it doesn't sound as nice.

MysticStick > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/21/2015 at 16:39

1

I have not had a chance to hear it in person yet but the videos I've watched it sounds wicked. But yeah, sound is kind of a big thing. Very much subjective but a big thing nonetheless.

Vicente Esteve > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/21/2015 at 17:05

1

Sedan>Coupe

M3>>>M4

E92M3 > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/21/2015 at 17:18

1

It looks huge parked next to an E92. I can't wait for the M2, even though it will have less power it should be right sized.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Vicente Esteve 02/21/2015 at 17:20

0

Eh.

Vicente Esteve > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/21/2015 at 17:21

1

I prefer the M3 Sedan to the M4 Coupe.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Vicente Esteve 02/21/2015 at 17:23

1

Eh.

Alex B > Vicente Esteve 02/21/2015 at 17:44

0

Dem fender flares.

Biggus Dickus (RevsBro) > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/21/2015 at 18:08

0

You lie!

HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/21/2015 at 18:18

0

Still refusing to call it an M4.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Biggus Dickus (RevsBro) 02/21/2015 at 18:46

0

I most certainly do not.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles 02/21/2015 at 18:47

0

You can call it Steve for all I care.

RedPir8Roberts > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/21/2015 at 18:54

0

Can we really be sure this is a BMW, and not a body-kitted Hyundai, since it's apparently not in a handicapped spot or taking up multiple spaces? Wait, he has no front license plate, who does this entitled person think he is (deducing he's not in one of the 19 states where you don't need them based on the period architecture and foliage or lack thereof) , BMW confirmed! (You let the air out of the 1.5 p.s.i. joke, so...)(used to own Z3, tempted to yell at drivers misbehaving in BMWs by yelling "I had a BMW and I didn't drive like a jerk!," then remembering they'll probably scoff at a Z3, if not also at whatever I'm in currently that's not a BMW).

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > RedPir8Roberts 02/21/2015 at 18:57

0

I know the owner, he's a nice guy. I can't picture him parking in two spaces or anything like that.

HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/21/2015 at 18:58

0

or I could call it an M3

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles 02/21/2015 at 18:58

0

How about MStev3?

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > MysticStick 02/21/2015 at 19:09

1

Ironically, I passed an identical one a couple hours later. Driver got on it. Yes it sounds good.

RedPir8Roberts > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/21/2015 at 19:44

1

Glad to hear it. As you said, well-chosen color. I like the styling, but I was surprised at how large it seems in person—model bloat is hitting BMW hard, and of course that explains the 2-Series' rise as the driver's car. If enough good guys manage to buy the M4, it'll help remove the stigma that does seem to attach to the marque now. I hear a lot of "BMW drivers" anecdotes out here where they are common, I can only imagine what a pariah one must feel in places where domestic / non luxury cars are the norm.

ly2v8-Brian > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/21/2015 at 20:15

1

I like Esotril Blue the best on these, but this color is great.

theloudmouth > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/22/2015 at 08:55

1

I need to drive one, but I can say that the regular 4-series is abysmal across the non-M range compared to the E9X... Appallingly so, it was shocking how much it felt like a Toyota in that it felt you were commuting, not driving.

EDIT: Oh and they're getting massive. It works well for the E39 M5-esque size M3, but the coupe is just too huge to me.

davesaddiction @ opposite-lock.com > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/23/2015 at 09:15

1

I can't get on board with the way that the headlights touch the grille, or the straight line cut at the front of the hood. Seems very "shouty", too. I've always preferred the Q-ship Ms, like the E39 M5.

I'm much more interested in seeing what they've come up with for the M2.