"Raymundo" (raymundo)
12/02/2015 at 16:13 • Filed to: None
3
15|
"Raymundo" (raymundo)
12/02/2015 at 16:13 • Filed to: None | 3
| 15 |
This is just too great. I’m trying to muffle my laughter and sound more productive at work but it’s just not happening. Check out this stellar review of the 2015 Ford Mustang vs China’s latest hot hatch.
Chariotoflove
> Raymundo
12/02/2015 at 16:26 |
|
“your mom’s boyfriend’s Mustang”, nice.
I can’t laugh for groaning so much.
TractorPillow
> Raymundo
12/02/2015 at 16:51 |
|
“with all those bailouts you’d expect a little more from Ford”
EXCELLENT!
Xyl0c41n3
> Raymundo
12/02/2015 at 17:20 |
|
That’s not a 2015 Mustang, it’s a 2014.
Svend
> Raymundo
12/02/2015 at 17:29 |
|
When did Scion (aka Toyota) become Chinese? How long was I asleep?
|
TractorPillow
> Xyl0c41n3
12/02/2015 at 17:50 |
|
Nope. Definitely a 2015
|
Xyl0c41n3
> TractorPillow
12/02/2015 at 19:20 |
|
Nope. The 2015 was completely redesigned and looks more sharklike. It was the first major design overhaul since the 2005 mustang replaced the New Edge 1999 - 2004 body style. See comparison photos below:
2015 on left, 2014 on right:
Again, 2015 on the left, 2014 on the right.
Interior of the 2015. Note the badge featuring an image of a galloping mustang is surrounded by a thin ring on the steering wheel, while on the 2014 the mustang is embossed on a silver circle:
Finally, a three-quarter view of both vehicles. The 2014 (bottom) still cleaves closely to the 1960s retro feel, with harsher lines and steeper cutoffs while the 2015’s lines (top) are sleek and fluid, melting one into the other:
|
TractorPillow
> Xyl0c41n3
12/02/2015 at 19:39 |
|
Haha man I thought you were kidding. All the facts in the video were wrong. I was just teasing you. The whole video is a joke.
|
Xyl0c41n3
> TractorPillow
12/02/2015 at 19:43 |
|
Derp. I didn’t watch the video. Was at work when I first made the comment and was going to watch it later. I think someone posted it here a long time ago but I forgot all about it. My bad.
|
TractorPillow
> Xyl0c41n3
12/02/2015 at 20:07 |
|
I hope someone that really doesn't know the difference argues with you in the future. Quite an extrnsively, well crafted rebuttal haha
|
Raymundo
> Xyl0c41n3
12/02/2015 at 21:52 |
|
Hahahahahahahaha
Jake - Has Bad Luck So You Don't Have To
> Raymundo
12/02/2015 at 22:21 |
|
*starts counting tropes on fingers*
*runs out of appendages*
wiffleballtony
> Raymundo
12/03/2015 at 12:30 |
|
I would like to think that this is all just for laughs, but it isn’t even funny.
|
Raymundo
> wiffleballtony
12/03/2015 at 16:44 |
|
I could see how not everyone would find this funny. I think I found it funny because the level of ignorance and dry humor was executed flawlessly. The older I get, the better at sarcasm and dry humor I get. It gets a little dangerous at times because interacting with new people within my age group or older don’t immediately pick up on the sarcasm and just think I’m a complete moron or they do pick up on it and think I’m a complete moron, and this is why I was so keen to this video. They didn’t act like they were being uneducated journalists, but rather they put forth the effort to create a seemingly bona fide “small guy” automotive review, but used completely idiotic information; some of which even psuedo-enthusiasts might miss.
|
wiffleballtony
> Raymundo
12/03/2015 at 17:21 |
|
I am a great fan of sarcasm, it’s how to survive corporate America. That said, it was pretty obvious they weren’t doing the review seriously. I just didn’t find it funny.
|
Raymundo
> wiffleballtony
12/03/2015 at 17:28 |
|
Fair enough.