"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
12/02/2015 at 11:36 • Filed to: None | 2 | 7 |
But damn.
McMike
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/02/2015 at 11:57 | 1 |
Found the intersection, and from this view, it explains all the bullseyes.
https://www.google.com/maps/@33.01969…
Brian, The Life of
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/02/2015 at 11:58 | 1 |
I was just there a couple weeks ago. While the drivers suck, the BBQ is delicious! We went to Lockheart. So. Damn. Good.
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/02/2015 at 12:08 | 1 |
“month” doesn’t reflect that all the incidents depicted are actually within only two weeks of that month. Meaning there’s more. A lot more.
Rico
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/02/2015 at 12:19 | 1 |
1) Why are there no lane markings at all? 2) Whose idea was it to put those stupid angle parking spots? I mean I know this isn’t “the big city” but make that sidewalk straight and make people parallel park, having people back out into traffic is recipe for disaster.
Probenja
> Rico
12/02/2015 at 12:35 | 1 |
I don’t know the reason why there aren’t lines, maybe they got erased? But that kind of parking is more space efficient, most people won’t have any issues as they just have to wait till no one is coming. But I guess people are too impatient in that town.
Svart Smart, traded in his Smart
> Rico
12/02/2015 at 12:40 | 1 |
I suspect the lane markings are easier to see IRL than in the video. (I could be mistaken.)
Svart Smart, traded in his Smart
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/02/2015 at 12:44 | 2 |
Some people have trouble with the basics of driving school: Turn right from the right-most lane. Turn left from the left-most lane. Turn into the first driving lane going your direction. (Exception: Multiple turn lanes.)