![]() 11/20/2015 at 19:35 • Filed to: Rating | ![]() | ![]() |
Pick any brand(s) and let’s give this a try.
Brand Attributes
Distribute points between the following attributes:
Performance
Innovation
Technology
Efficiency
Design
Comfort and Amenities
Value (within market segment)
Service
- A Zero in any category denotes that you perceive the brand to be at the bottom of all market segments in terms of that respective attribute. It does NOT mean the brand is without that attribute.
- There is no limit to the amount of points one attribute can be given.
Rating Personal Perceptions
Total up your points and determine whether your personal view of the brand falls into the Commodity, Premium, Luxury, or Exotic market segments.
Commodity: minimum 32 points
Premium: minimum 40 points
Luxury: minimum
48 points
Exotic:minimum 56 points
If point totals are below 32, the brand is below the mainstream. Adjust points as needed until you feel comfortable with the result.
Personal Examples:
Kia - Commodity (32)
Performance 1
Innovation 0
Technology 3
Efficiency 3
Design 6
Comfort and Amenities
8
Value (within market segment) 9
Service 2
Acura - Premium (40)
Performance 5
Innovation 2
Technology 9
Efficiency 6
Design 3
Comfort and Amenities
7
Value (within market segment) 4
Service 4
Jaguar - Luxury (48)
Performance 10
Innovation 1
Technology 3
Efficiency
2
Design 12
Comfort and Amenities
8
Value (within market segment) 4
Service 8
Lamborghini - Exotic (56)
Performance
18
Innovation 5
Technology 6
Efficiency
1
Design 18
Comfort and Amenities
4
Value (within market segment)
0
Service 4
While you’re adding up points, you may find that your perception of the brand is actually above their market segment. Though I thought Toyota and Ford were Commodity Brands, I found myself tending to run Premium point totals.
![]() 11/20/2015 at 19:40 |
|
well Toyota and Lexus would qualify as exotic :p
![]() 11/20/2015 at 19:41 |
|
Luxgen:
Performance 5
Innovation 1
Technology 6
Efficiency 5
Design 7
Comfort and Amenities 6
Value (within market segment) 4
Service 2
![]() 11/20/2015 at 19:42 |
|
I think most Toyota and Lexus buyers would agree. “My ‘89 LS was built much better than this Roll Royce!”
![]() 11/20/2015 at 19:47 |
|
I just scored Lincoln at a 46, using a 0-10 scale. That puts it somewhere just below luxury, at the upper end of the premium scale; which I think actually sounds about right.
![]() 11/20/2015 at 19:56 |
|
Lada.
Performance - 0
Innovation - 0
Technology - 0
Efficiency - 2
Design - 0
Comfort - 0
Value - 28
Service - 2
ALL HAIL MOTHER RUSSIA
![]() 11/20/2015 at 20:28 |
|
Honda
Performance - 3
Innovation - 5
Technology - 6
Efficiency - 7
Design - 3
Comfort and Amenities - 4
Value (within market segment) - 5
Service - 8
Total : 43: Premium