![]() 11/11/2015 at 16:20 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() 11/11/2015 at 16:30 |
|
It’s not a trick question. The final temp is based on compression, which there’s at least a 50% chance the engine has. Ignition, otoh...
Also Mastering Physics lol (been there, done that)
![]() 11/11/2015 at 16:38 |
|
Excactly :D
No need for ignition if you just want the temp for compression.
![]() 11/11/2015 at 16:45 |
|
We can ignore the effects of fuel during the compression stroke not just because it’s inconsequential but because there’s no way the fuel injection is working either. At least if it’s a throttle body-air assisted fuel injection early model.
![]() 11/11/2015 at 16:50 |
|
But you’re assuming the starter is working to crank it over. And you know what assuming does...
![]() 11/11/2015 at 16:52 |
|
Not necessarily. There could be a very PO’d mechanic on the crank bolt with a torque handle.
![]() 11/11/2015 at 17:17 |
|
775.5°K (936.2°F)
![]() 11/11/2015 at 17:47 |
|
Every time you put a degree symbol before Kelvin, God dips a kitten in liquid helium.
![]() 11/11/2015 at 20:39 |
|
I don’t, actually.
![]() 11/11/2015 at 22:37 |
|
Assume, it makes an “Ass” out of “u” and “me”. But mostly you. Ha!
![]() 11/12/2015 at 04:45 |
|
And every time someone uses Farenheit in a technical application he kills a puppy. True story.
![]() 11/12/2015 at 08:12 |
|
I feel like you missed the joke...
![]() 11/12/2015 at 08:45 |
|
Yuuup... I was several beers and a few scotches deep at that point last night.
![]() 11/12/2015 at 10:21 |
|
Sorry, still catching up on my meeting notes from the 1968
General Conference on Weights and Measures
.
I will no longer add the ° symbol to Kelvin temperature measurements.
Poor Kittens...