If you even knew this existed...

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 11/02/2015 at 18:43 • Filed to: None

1

33

You probably forgot about it. And even if you didn’t forget about it, you may never have seen one before. And even if you’ve seen one before, it probably wasn’t this clean. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I present to you a factory-fresh 1992 Infiniti M30 convertible.

Nibby > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/02/2015 at 18:46

3

I’m trying to forget about that HS250h next to it. Horrible car.

EL_ULY > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/02/2015 at 18:48

0

Fancy Tsuru 2 door vert?

coelacanthist > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/02/2015 at 18:50

3

I recall an argument in the movie Three Kings...

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > EL_ULY 11/02/2015 at 18:51

1

Nothing nearly as lowly as that. A rebadged 2nd generation Nissan Leopard.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > coelacanthist 11/02/2015 at 18:52

0

Huh?

Your boy, BJR > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/02/2015 at 18:52

0

This convertible is clearly a Lexus.

EL_ULY > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/02/2015 at 18:53

1

Nothing nearly as lowly fucking legendary as that.

:]

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Your boy, BJR 11/02/2015 at 18:54

0

Do tell.

JQJ213- Now With An Extra Cylinder! > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/02/2015 at 18:54

1

Remember it very well. Why?

Almost bought one for my first car. It was an original owner garage kept example with under 30k miles.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > EL_ULY 11/02/2015 at 18:54

1

Whatever you wish.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > JQJ213- Now With An Extra Cylinder! 11/02/2015 at 18:56

1

I think “Old Floridians” is all the more explanation I need here.

coelacanthist > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/02/2015 at 18:57

0

ranwhenparked > coelacanthist 11/02/2015 at 18:58

0

Yeah, that’s literally the only way I knew this car existed, or continue to remember that it existed.

JQJ213- Now With An Extra Cylinder! > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/02/2015 at 18:58

1

Yeah. The seller was a retiree from Chicago in his 80s. He told us stories about Vietnam and had the veteran front plate...

Your boy, BJR > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/02/2015 at 18:59

0

You’ve clearly never seen Three Kings.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Your boy, BJR 11/02/2015 at 18:59

0

Never mind got it.

AMC/Renauledge > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/02/2015 at 19:00

2

I always thought these looked way out of proportion with the convertible top up. Way too upright for such a low, linear body.

http://testdrivejunkie.com/1991-infiniti-…

dogisbadob > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/02/2015 at 19:01

2

I remember these cars and can’t forget about them. In fact, I almost bought one. I made an appointment to go see one at the dealer, but on the way there it was crashed and hit! Smashed on all four sides (the ad showed photos all around the car, every angle, the car looked great)

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Your boy, BJR 11/02/2015 at 19:02

0

Clearly. But I watched that particular clip.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > AMC/Renauledge 11/02/2015 at 19:03

0

Yup. Better with the top down, but best with a hardtop.

Your boy, BJR > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/02/2015 at 19:03

0

Marky Mark keeps talking about buying a Lexus convertible with the gold they take from Saddam. Ice Cube keeps correcting him, telling him Lexus doesn’t make a convertible, only Infiniti does.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Your boy, BJR 11/02/2015 at 19:04

0

I just watched it.

yitznewton > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/02/2015 at 19:07

1

I saw a really clean last-gen Staza just this past week! I loved the look of that car back in the day. Yeah, I was into boxy sedans.

dogisbadob > AMC/Renauledge 11/02/2015 at 19:13

0

Better than today’s convertibles where the belt line is so fucking high

mazda616 > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/02/2015 at 19:22

1

I saw one of these locally around a year ago. Never saw it again. Maybe they garaged it hoping it'd be a future classic!

T5Killer > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/02/2015 at 19:24

3

you guys have never seen “Three kings”? they talk about that car a lot LOL.

daender > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/02/2015 at 19:54

1

You’re looking at 3500 or so pounds of convertible and only 160 hp with a 4-speed slush-box to motivate it through an open differential. 0-60 in 9.7 seconds. It might be a classic one day, but it’ll be a slow-cruising one.

AMC/Renauledge > dogisbadob 11/02/2015 at 19:54

1

Right. Well they need to be in order to pass CUV-height safety standards. And at least those high belt lines lead to better trunk space.

HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 11/02/2015 at 20:03

1

I reeeally wanted to buy one back in 09 when I was trying to replace my first car. It had some front end damage after hitting a deer. I ended up walking away after deciding I had to have a manual trans.

I’d still love to have one as a drift car project.

HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles > Nibby 11/02/2015 at 20:04

0

the CT250H is much “cooler”.

Nibby > HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles 11/02/2015 at 20:09

0

still a turd

HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles > Nibby 11/02/2015 at 20:10

0

But a cool looking one.

OPPOsaurus WRX > T5Killer 11/02/2015 at 20:51

1

exactly what i thought of