![]() 01/22/2015 at 14:42 • Filed to: LEASE, BUY | ![]() | ![]() |
Is it just me, or is it really pretty simple? There are two groups of people.
GROUP 1: People who want to save the maximum amount of money over their lives. BUY.
GROUP 2: People who want to save the maximum amount of money over their lives, while driving a new car. LEASE.
And then there are some outliers who are very complicated and they just need to figure it out for themselves.
Clownshoe for listening to me:
![]() 01/22/2015 at 14:45 |
|
Yep, that's pretty much it.
![]() 01/22/2015 at 14:46 |
|
Then there is me
![]() 01/22/2015 at 14:52 |
|
Well yes, but they need something to write about...
![]() 01/22/2015 at 14:56 |
|
This came up on Jalopnik years ago, but someone did the basic math and found out that, on average, the cheapest way to have a car was to buy a five year old car, sell it after five years, then buy another five year old car. It was a Pareto optimization that minimized overall expenditure between purchase price, depreciation and repairs, assuming that incremental improvements in fuel economy and absolute (not age-related) reliability would be minimal over five years, and that the owner had no mechanical experience and would pay a shop for all repairs. Of course, people do value things other than money, but there is (based on currently available data) a single correct way to drive while spending the least possible amount of money. It involves never touching a new car, bought or leased.
![]() 01/22/2015 at 15:18 |
|
nope. winter tires are better beca...oh wait.
![]() 01/22/2015 at 15:27 |
|
COTD. :)
![]() 01/22/2015 at 15:29 |
|
This is a very interesting proposition! Thanks for sharing. :)