"BJ" (benjamin-bignell)
01/10/2015 at 22:15 • Filed to: land rover, lr3, out of the frying pan into the fire | 2 | 11 |
The fever has broken! That's right, I no longer have Disco fever and can move on with my life!
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
I went to see a nice-looking 2004 Land Rover Discover this morning, and it was, quite honestly, underwhelming. It's a much smaller vehicle than I imagined, the interior is more snug-fitting than I expected, and the combination of odd, strangely-placed buttons, flimsy doors, and overall British-ness of the truck left me underwhelmed.
(The truck I saw has been in Quebec its entire life and was showing the results of the ferocious, salty winters we have here. There was a bit of rust showing up everywhere and the undercarriage was a real horror show.)
I'm not terribly disappointed, because it wasn't a realistic choice for the reliable family transportation I need, but it was an eye-opening experience.
And now for the bad news ...
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
I test drove a 2005 Land Rover LR3 in pretty good condition and it was absolutely amazing . Low kms, clean paint, working air suspension, and it spent half of its life in the Canadian Prairies where road salt is pretty much non-existant. It was luxurious. It was smooth. It had power and comfort and 7 seats and so much class...
It's a beautiful machine, but the maintenance records are basically non-existent. 18-inch winter tires will cost me a fortune. Good Land Rover garages aren't exactly growing on trees.
le sigh... I've still got some other 4x4s to look at (4Runners mostly) but I think I know how this is going to end.
Jedidiah
> BJ
01/10/2015 at 22:31 | 0 |
Maybe a Jeep Wagoneer is the vehicle you're looking for?
Heinously unreliably, comfortable, and classic 4wd suv.
Parts are infinitely more common and affordable than a LR; they never changed sheetmetal from 63 to 91.
BJ
> Jedidiah
01/10/2015 at 22:36 | 1 |
Ha! Not a bad idea, but they're non-existant here in Eastern Canada, having gone - I assume - off to the great rust bucket in the sky.
Jedidiah
> BJ
01/10/2015 at 22:40 | 0 |
It is unforunate; large flat untreated sheet metal tends to disintegrate. I've been on a wishlisting splurge for classic suvs recently.
HammerheadFistpunch
> BJ
01/10/2015 at 22:54 | 0 |
If you are looking at LR3 money, surely you are looking at 100 series money too.
BaconSandwich is tasty.
> BJ
01/10/2015 at 23:39 | 0 |
"... life in the Canadian Prairies where road salt is pretty much non-existant."
As someone who lives in the Canadian prairies, I beg to differ. Yes, not as bad as Ontario for salt, but we definitely still use it.:
Cé hé sin
> BJ
01/11/2015 at 05:18 | 0 |
Google, Google...but the LR3 as it's called over there is still a Discovery!
You're not better yet.
Disco Mk3:
LR3
BJ
> Cé hé sin
01/11/2015 at 07:14 | 0 |
Shhh... You'll burst my bubble!
I know it's still a Discovery but it's not at all the same vehicle.
BJ
> HammerheadFistpunch
01/11/2015 at 07:19 | 1 |
Strangely, no. The 100 was only sold here as a Lexus and if you find one for less than 12k it's a sad, beat-up affair that should probably be euthanized.
(Nationwide on Autotrader there are 2 LX470 for sale for 15k or less. One is 15k and 5000 kms from me, the other is being sold as-is from a street corner lot with true mileage unknown for 10k.)
An LR3 here starts a bit under 9k and they tend to be in good condition. A strange state of affairs.
BJ
> BaconSandwich is tasty.
01/11/2015 at 07:22 | 0 |
Yes, you're right, but relatively speaking the road salt a southern Alberta car sees is a drop in ocean compared to what a Quebec car suffers through annually.
(I grew up near Edmonton and have been in Montreal for 8 years now.)
BJ
> HammerheadFistpunch
01/11/2015 at 07:29 | 0 |
To be fair, however, a 15k Land Cruiser/LX would probably cost me less over 10 years than the Land Rover. Over 5 years - a more realistic timeframe - the difference might be a wash. It's hard to say...
BJ
> HammerheadFistpunch
01/11/2015 at 07:45 | 0 |
Correction - the LR3 starts at around 7500 out here. That's what, 10% of the new value? So tempting!