![]() 01/05/2015 at 17:11 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Used car face-off: 2010 Volvo S80 versus 2012 Buick Lucerne, both with 65k miles. Which do you choose and why?
![]() 01/05/2015 at 17:13 |
|
S80, because the Lucerne doesn't come in RHD. And because it's a better car in every way, I'd guess.
![]() 01/05/2015 at 17:13 |
|
Buick.
American reliability and cheap easy to work on repairs if needed.
![]() 01/05/2015 at 17:15 |
|
Volvo, because the 2012 Lucerne is actually a 2011, and Volvos are cool.
![]() 01/05/2015 at 17:15 |
|
I don't see his comment yet, but I'm pretty sure Murdersofa would choose the Buick...So would I.
![]() 01/05/2015 at 17:16 |
|
S80 for sure. My parents have a 2006 Lucerne CXL. It's nice on the highway but a total bore in town. It's very old school Buick, a boat on the road with handling to match. My parents like to float so it fits them.
![]() 01/05/2015 at 17:16 |
|
Volvo because Sweden.
![]() 01/05/2015 at 17:17 |
|
Volvo, that interior is something from my contemporary dreams, plus it looks niecer, feels nicer and is much more comfortable.
![]() 01/05/2015 at 17:19 |
|
![]() 01/05/2015 at 17:23 |
|
S80. It's a nice executive car with a modern interior. Also Volvo.
![]() 01/05/2015 at 17:26 |
|
Volvo, because recalls and forever questionable quality. With the Volvo, I already know what I'm getting into. The interior is also a lot nicer.
![]() 01/05/2015 at 17:26 |
|
Volvo because it's infinitely more interesting, although I'd rather have the pre-2010 Yamaha V8.
![]() 01/05/2015 at 17:27 |
|
Is the Lucerne AWD?
![]() 01/06/2015 at 17:15 |
|
Volvo because its not a Buick...