I for one, welcome our new FI future.

"McChiken116 - Patrick H." (mcchiken116) 09/29/2014 at 13:42 • Filed to: None

4

8

Boost isn't a bad word. Tradition holds us back! Adapt or die! There is no car that isn't better with a little compression.

Hammerfrog > McChiken116 - Patrick H. 09/29/2014 at 13:44

0

Where did you see this!?

PS9 > McChiken116 - Patrick H. 09/29/2014 at 13:45

2

Blasphemy.

McChiken116 - Patrick H. > Hammerfrog 09/29/2014 at 13:46

2

The parking lot of the WEC race at COTA

spanfucker retire bitch > McChiken116 - Patrick H. 09/29/2014 at 13:50

1

Here here!

Logansteno: Bought a VW? > McChiken116 - Patrick H. 09/29/2014 at 13:53

1

I love me a naturally aspirated Chevy V8.

But... I love a supercharged one even more.

I for one welcome our forced induction overlords.

JR1 > McChiken116 - Patrick H. 09/29/2014 at 13:56

2

NA or go home

feather-throttle-not-hair > McChiken116 - Patrick H. 09/29/2014 at 13:58

1

I liked boost back when it also injected cars with a healthy dose of personality. Boosting an engine these days though, seems to result in the exact opposite.

My point being that things were better back in my day. And you kids have it too easy these days. and rent is too damn high. or something.

GhostZ > McChiken116 - Patrick H. 09/29/2014 at 14:11

1

I, however, am against using turbos to get around inadequate output out of an engine that is otherwise an anemic pile of junk. For the same HP level, I'll take a 7500rpm N/A engine with a linear powerband over a 5000rpm turbo engine with a fat parabola of a powerband.