2016 ND Interior

"SonorousSpeedJoe" (SonorousSpeedJoe) 09/03/2014 at 22:35 • Filed to: None

2

7

I can't tell whether that screen is fixed or retractable, but I've never been one to care about that detail on a non-luxury car. Otherwise, I'm liking what I can see - from this angle, that is. MOAR INTERIOR PICS, PLEASE.

CPT Speedbump > SonorousSpeedJoe 09/03/2014 at 22:39

0

Screen=weight

The Transporter > SonorousSpeedJoe 09/03/2014 at 22:39

0

If it's anything like the Mazda3, it's fixed. Don't try to remove one from the floor model at the dealership. Trust me.

Victorious Secret > SonorousSpeedJoe 09/03/2014 at 22:43

0

This shit doesn't look premium on a 100k BMW, it does not look premium on a 20-30k Mazda.

Laziness in its truest form. If adding a cowl/shroud was too much weight to integrate it, why offer a screen in the first place, if such concerns are really such concerns?

SonorousSpeedJoe > The Transporter 09/03/2014 at 22:44

0

I'll take your word for it.

It's just that the back of it looks somewhat curved, which makes it look like it could tilt forward and retract into the dash for a flush look.

Denver Is Stuck In The 90s > SonorousSpeedJoe 09/03/2014 at 22:50

1

maybe it's detachable

theuserformerlyknownasaluminumfoil > The Transporter 09/04/2014 at 08:27

0

... go on...

WhereAreMyPants > Victorious Secret 09/04/2014 at 13:18

0

Because it doesn't need a cowl or shroud any more? Modern displays work perfectly fine in direct sunlight.

It looks plenty premium, you just don't like it.