![]() 06/30/2014 at 13:55 • Filed to: Journalism | ![]() | ![]() |
I've just read the phrase "visceral bark" to describe a Nissan GT-R's exhaust note. Should this phrase be banned in car reviews?
How about we make up some daft descriptions of exhaust/engine notes for journalists to use in reviews. I'll start...
Animalistic shriek. Earthy howl. Catatonic wail. Primeval fart. Metallic yelp. Rorty bellow.
Any more?
![]() 06/30/2014 at 13:56 |
|
Just go find....pretty much anything Italian. Copy that. Make life better for the entire world.
![]() 06/30/2014 at 14:06 |
|
Sounds like a perfectly cromulent description to me
![]() 06/30/2014 at 14:07 |
|
I believe exhausts sounds should be described using children's nonsense words and auto journos should know they have our approval to use them.
A Jag F-type would be described as follows
VrooooooooomcrackcrackVroooooooomPOPcrkcrkcrkcrkBrabahbahbabahVroooooooooooooom.
![]() 06/30/2014 at 14:08 |
|
A few weeks ago at c&c, I heard a guy describe the m4 exhaust as a "Walrus bellow".
He then admitted that he had never heard a Walrus below, but he imagined that it would sound like an m4.
![]() 06/30/2014 at 14:21 |
|
Um. That is a terrible description of a stock GT-R's exhaust. GT-Rs exhausts sound like powerful vacuum cleaners, aka, not good at all. At redline it sounds...ok? Better from outside that inside? Kind of trumpet-y. The furthest thing from a visceral bark, or any of the other descriptions you listed.
Source: Had one, was disappointed.
![]() 06/30/2014 at 14:31 |
|
If one's viscera are barking, isn't that usually called flatulence?
(Yes, I know what he was trying to say - just roll with it.)