![]() 05/12/2014 at 12:20 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
It sounds like it's going to be a class competitive car this time around. Even in 4-cylinder Limited trim, it seems like a good ride. Maybe it'll get into the ranks of the Camry and Accord?
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 05/12/2014 at 12:23 |
|
That engine has been universally panned in the Dart. Why is it suddenly okay in the 200?
![]() 05/12/2014 at 12:25 |
|
Probably a better transmission for starters. Beyond that, I don't know. If I were to ever be in the market for the 200, it'd be the V6 or bust.
![]() 05/12/2014 at 12:25 |
|
Who knows. I don't think the 2.4 is a horrible engine for the applications it's used in.
![]() 05/12/2014 at 12:28 |
|
Same. I actually would look at a 3.6 AWD.
![]() 05/12/2014 at 12:28 |
|
I guess the 1.4T didn't test well with lux buyers lol
![]() 05/12/2014 at 12:37 |
|
the prices are higher than original projected though. up around 31 for an S AWD, for 3k more you could get a Charger R/T AWD.
![]() 05/12/2014 at 12:39 |
|
I thought the Dart Rallye was supposed to be a bit of Alfa goodness in disguise? Anyone here have one that can comment?
![]() 05/12/2014 at 13:37 |
|
It's not unattractive, but already looks dated both inside and out. Let's hope it drives well, at least.
Also...do they really need to label the tach and speedo? Just in case the rental masses get mixed up?