What?

"CAcoalminer" (CAcoalminer) 04/24/2014 at 12:00 • Filed to: None

3

4

I can't believe my nomination of the McLaren P1 did not make today's !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! ? Am I the only one who thinks the McLaren P1 would be "amazing as [a] convertible"? I mean the X6? Really? Anyway, here are some renderings:

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!

More color options !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! .

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!

JR1 > CAcoalminer 04/24/2014 at 12:05

0

The P1 is supposed to be a hardcore top of the line expression of engineering. A convertible would compromise the weight, structural rigidity, and aero. That is why it might not have been chosen.

spanfucker retire bitch > JR1 04/24/2014 at 12:14

3

If what McLaren says of the 650S Spyder is correct, it would not compromise structural rigidity due to the Carbon fiber tub that they use (which is the same tub that's used in the P1).

You are correct on the other counts, however.

CAcoalminer > JR1 04/24/2014 at 12:16

1

I can understand your point but the question, as I understood it, was what cars would be amazing as convertibles. Personally, I think even with the extra weight and reduction in rigidity (though slight) and aero that it would be an amazing convertible but maybe that's just me.

monkeyracing > CAcoalminer 04/27/2014 at 20:19

0

Convertibles are for Barbie dolls and flamboyant extroverts. Hard tops are hard core.