"Jagvar" (Jagvar)
04/23/2014 at 14:57 • Filed to: None
1
8|
"Jagvar" (Jagvar)
04/23/2014 at 14:57 • Filed to: None | 1
| 8 |
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! 104K miles (not bad for a 17-year-old wagon), and a $4,500 asking price. NPOCP?
jkm7680
> Jagvar
04/23/2014 at 14:59 |
|
I'd say it would be an NP for around $2,500
These generally tend to be overpriced. I'll do a KBB to see if my suspicions are right though.
505Turbeaux
> Jagvar
04/23/2014 at 15:04 |
|
beware that crappy transmission. Also low air in the rear tires doesn't bode well. Nice color though. 3rd seat is not rare at all too
Tom McParland
> Jagvar
04/23/2014 at 15:27 |
|
The reliability of that would pair great with your Phaeton
|
Jagvar
> Tom McParland
04/23/2014 at 15:27 |
|
I know, right?
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Jagvar
04/23/2014 at 15:30 |
|
That is identical to my mom's old car. Like, that actually could be her old car. I'm tempted to buy it just to mess with her.
ColoradoTaco
> Jagvar
04/23/2014 at 15:38 |
|
It's overpriced, C5s (this one is a C4) tend to be priced about there. The 2.8 V6 is probably one of Audi's most reliable engines though. 2000-2500 could be NP
STREPITUS
> Jagvar
04/23/2014 at 15:43 |
|
CP all the way. I bought one of these as my first car in near perfect condition with 130k miles in 2006 for $3200. I don't think its classic enough to have increased in value over the last 8 years (even with the lower mileage).
190e30-Now with COSWORTH
> Jagvar
04/23/2014 at 16:46 |
|
I'd spring a bit more (a grand, two max) for an S4 or S6. Turbo 20v I5 is much more fun, and probably more reliable.