Worst Mustang Ever?

"JR1" (type35bugatti) 04/19/2014 at 11:01 • Filed to: Mustang, Oppositelock

1

23

In honor of the Mustang and her 50th anniversary I thought I would make a poll of the worst Mustang ever. And no the Mustang II is not on the list that is too easy of an answer. Leave an argument down below for your reasoning.

Worst Mustang Ever?

JQJ213- Now With An Extra Cylinder! > JR1 04/19/2014 at 11:05

2

1999-2004. It really lost a lot of the style and charm associated with the older Stang.There weren't many references to the classic 60s other than the name and horse

gawdzillla > JQJ213- Now With An Extra Cylinder! 04/19/2014 at 11:09

4

I am not a mustang fan but I think the 03 cobra was acceptable

JQJ213- Now With An Extra Cylinder! > gawdzillla 04/19/2014 at 11:10

0

I guess it really depends on how you took the question. performance wise these were really solid. But for looks and connection to the classic, I think they didn't do great

JR1 > JQJ213- Now With An Extra Cylinder! 04/19/2014 at 11:18

0

Really? I thought one of that eras biggest redeeming factors was the Mach 1

camaroboy68ss > JR1 04/19/2014 at 11:18

1

I voted fox body, I cant stand them. when I was like 3-5 my dad had a 5.0 fox and I hated riding in the back of that thing. I can still vividly remember how much I disliked riding in that thing. My grandparents at the same time had a 3rd gen Camaro Z28 and I loved that car. I think it was the T-tops

JR1 > camaroboy68ss 04/19/2014 at 11:20

0

The backseat of any Mustang can make you start to hate them pretty fast!

ly2v8-Brian > JR1 04/19/2014 at 11:23

2

No button for all of them. Except the 1st gen, they look good.

jkm7680 > JR1 04/19/2014 at 11:24

3

Just look at it. #Vomits

AthomSfere > JR1 04/19/2014 at 11:24

1

My least favorite Mustang is always the:

87-93. (Really 79 - 93!) Third generation.

It looks more like a Tempo than it does a Mustang.

Power was non existent really, with the 302 (Depending on year) Horsepower was 140-220 horsepower, it might be unfair to compare it but the current Civic Si with a 2.4l I4 gets what, 204hp?

I am so torn on these Fox Bodies. On the one hand it got some of the ethos of the original Mustang, but in so many ways it couldn't have failed worse.

AthomSfere > camaroboy68ss 04/19/2014 at 11:26

0

I did too, but he split the Fox Bodies between two year gaps. 4th gen = fox body...

JQJ213- Now With An Extra Cylinder! > JR1 04/19/2014 at 11:26

1

I guess it depends on how you take he question. I based my answer purely on looks. These cars did perform well, but the looks killed them for me

CPT Speedbump > JR1 04/19/2014 at 11:28

1

The back seat of my mums 66' Is awesome, specially in the dark, look up, and you can see out the top of the rear window, and thus can look at the stars while riding

JEM > JR1 04/19/2014 at 12:09

0

I personally love the styling of the Mustang 2 but that's just me. I know, performance, yadda yadda but performance wasn't great anywhere then.

For me, the worst is what I call the "bloat-stang", the 71-73 years. Too big and too fugly.

JR1 > JEM 04/19/2014 at 12:14

1

The base were rather ugly I'll give you that but I liked these:

Mach 1s were pretty cool. But to each his own.

JR1 > AthomSfere 04/19/2014 at 12:15

0

There were so down on power I would personally never want to own one.

AthomSfere > JR1 04/19/2014 at 12:22

1

You could fully modernize one and it would be good, decent handling too for a Mustang. But if you are going to go through that, why not buy a ~99 Mustang (looks worlds and worlds better) and fully modernize that instead?

FRSFTW-ActuallyboughtaFocusST > JR1 04/19/2014 at 12:26

0

I must say the 2010 GT was the worst from an owner perspective. I bought it because I was dumb and 19 and just couldnt wait the few months to grab a 5.0. So, once the new one came out I had to explain why I only had the 4.6 in my new Mustang...

StoneCold > JR1 04/19/2014 at 12:26

1

I would argue the 2010 still belongs with the 05 to 09 grouping because of the engines. And whoever voted 64 to 70 is a straight up troll. I'm also kinda torn about whether to group the 69 to 70 with the 71 to 73....

JR1 > FRSFTW-ActuallyboughtaFocusST 04/19/2014 at 13:24

0

I feel bad for you that was a big slap in the face by Ford

1337HPMustang > JR1 04/19/2014 at 16:55

1

FRSFTW-ActuallyboughtaFocusST > JR1 04/19/2014 at 20:09

1

It rally was; makes me nervous to go after the 2015

JEM > JR1 04/19/2014 at 20:17

1

Yeah the Mach 1 edition sport roof was definitely the best version of that, and not a bad looking car.... from the windows back anyhow. That thing had a chin bigger than Leno though.

Philbert/Phartnagle > JR1 04/23/2014 at 02:22

1

There are no "worst" Mustangs for me. Each generation has had its quirks and issues to be sure, but I've been happy to just see them appear new and sparkling at the Ford dealers year after year after year.