Which Would You Buy: Weird Obscure and Different.

Kinja'd!!! "Dwhite - Powered by Caffeine, Daft Punk, and Corgis" (Dwhite95)
04/03/2014 at 13:22 • Filed to: None

Kinja'd!!!0 Kinja'd!!! 5

Today we have two little thought of cars from 1968. While these cars pander to two very different demographics they both have a very low price to get in on the game. Oldsmobile vs. Jaguar? Thats a battle you wont hear very often.

First up we have a !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! priced at $6,600. Its described as very good original condition, and it looks it too. But no real mention to the condition of the mechanics, which could be the difference between a good buy and a money pit. Still, can you resist the beautiful black and tan color combo?

Kinja'd!!!

Second competitor today is a !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! priced at $5,000 (obo). It is described as a running, driving car that needs TLC on the paint. Also points out that it only has 49,000 original miles, and thats about it. Not much description on this car to be honest.

Kinja'd!!!

DISCUSSION (5)


Kinja'd!!! Jagvar > Dwhite - Powered by Caffeine, Daft Punk, and Corgis
04/03/2014 at 13:27

Kinja'd!!!0

I think I'd have to pick the Jaaaaaaag.


Kinja'd!!! 'Wägen, EPA LOL > Dwhite - Powered by Caffeine, Daft Punk, and Corgis
04/03/2014 at 13:52

Kinja'd!!!0

I second the Jaaaaaaaaaaaaag.


Kinja'd!!! chuck07 > Dwhite - Powered by Caffeine, Daft Punk, and Corgis
04/03/2014 at 14:15

Kinja'd!!!0

As much as I love the style of the jag, I am going with the olds. That $6600 jag can easily be a $26600 car after a year. I don't think the Olds is as destructive. And I love boat coupes.


Kinja'd!!! JEM > Dwhite - Powered by Caffeine, Daft Punk, and Corgis
04/03/2014 at 14:59

Kinja'd!!!0

As much as I think it's probably a bad idea, I have to vote Jag.


Kinja'd!!! catkam623 misses his 944 > chuck07
04/09/2014 at 21:06

Kinja'd!!!0

I agree I'm a sucker for 60s boats and I quote "nothing before or since has ever said fuck you so eloquently"