"AMC/Renauledge" (n2skylark)
03/27/2014 at 15:17 • Filed to: None | 3 | 17 |
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! ?
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Nothing makes sense anymore. If it doesn't pull off a W123 miracle, I... I don't...
I can't...
...
...Please help.
Logansteno: Bought a VW?
> AMC/Renauledge
03/27/2014 at 15:20 | 2 |
Go anywhere SUV with a wonderful 4.0 straight 6, or a 90s Japanese econobox? This shouldn't be a hard question to answer!
Goggles Pizzano
> AMC/Renauledge
03/27/2014 at 15:23 | 2 |
I think many of these odd eliminations are due to people mistaking "ultimate beater" for "most desirable". Age demographics and actually having no idea what makes a great beater also play into it.
crowmolly
> AMC/Renauledge
03/27/2014 at 15:23 | 0 |
For the life of me I don't know either. I know and see far more bombed out XJs than I do Imprezas.
ncasolowork2
> AMC/Renauledge
03/27/2014 at 15:26 | 0 |
Impreza is awesome. XJ is still cool but not as cool.
Nibbles
> AMC/Renauledge
03/27/2014 at 15:26 | 0 |
Because the general populace sees "Impreza" and automatically thinks WRX/STi.
I haven't voted for the Impreza, just like I haven't voted for the E36 or the Jetta.
gt6xxer
> AMC/Renauledge
03/27/2014 at 15:26 | 1 |
2.5 RS
For Sweden
> AMC/Renauledge
03/27/2014 at 15:28 | 0 |
JDM yo
crowmolly
> ncasolowork2
03/27/2014 at 15:28 | 1 |
Preface: Not starting shit. And I love Subies.
But I gotta know- what makes it better transportation than an XJ? Coolness aside.
Party-vi
> ncasolowork2
03/27/2014 at 15:29 | 1 |
WUT
ncasolowork2
> crowmolly
03/27/2014 at 15:53 | 0 |
They're both good in their own way. I'd rather have the Impreza because I can hoon the Impreza more than the Jeep. I had a 94 Grand Cherokee Limited with a V8 in it for a number of years. I'd rather have the Impreza unless I needed to haul something.
AMC/Renauledge
> gt6xxer
03/27/2014 at 15:58 | 0 |
Cherokee 4.0 is faster, leaks less oil, and is more reliable.
AMC/Renauledge
> ncasolowork2
03/27/2014 at 15:59 | 0 |
You realize that the 4.0 Cherokee is faster, more reliable, and better off-road. So it's superior in hoonage.
And you're talking about the ZJ Grand Cherokee, not the XJ Cherokee. Totally different beasts.
StoneCold
> AMC/Renauledge
03/27/2014 at 16:02 | 1 |
Like a true Chicagoan, I've voted for the Jeep 4 times, as well as the Fox-body.
AMC/Renauledge
> Goggles Pizzano
03/27/2014 at 16:05 | 0 |
Still doesn't explain the Mk3 Jetta beating the Mazda MX-3.
Goggles Pizzano
> AMC/Renauledge
03/27/2014 at 16:07 | 1 |
You're right. To me this one makes sense. I might be more inclined to fix up an MX-3 and just run the Jetta over curbs and into the ground.
gt6xxer
> AMC/Renauledge
03/27/2014 at 16:15 | 0 |
Wait... Did you just try to tell me a Cherokee is faster? Its not. It might be quicker in a short range of acceleration. You still couldn't give me a shit Cherokee. You could sell me a shit 2.5 RS for a couple thowe
crowmolly
> AMC/Renauledge
03/27/2014 at 17:31 | 0 |
You can fix an XJ with bailing wire and Twizzlers. That's a great beater.