1.5L Fusion

Kinja'd!!! "Yowen - not necessarily not spaghetti and meatballs" (yowen)
03/13/2014 at 15:13 • Filed to: None

Kinja'd!!!0 Kinja'd!!! 7

So I just now found out there is a 1.5 liter fusion for 2014. How did I find out? livernois performance is looking for a car to do testing on, this is some preliminary results (remember these numbers are at the wheels). Not too shabby... That is what? At least 135 hp/liter at the crank?

Let's see, after my tune+downpipes I'll be at ~450hp at the crank which is 129hp/liter out of my EB3.5...


DISCUSSION (7)


Kinja'd!!! themanwithsauce - has as many vehicles as job titles > Yowen - not necessarily not spaghetti and meatballs
03/13/2014 at 15:38

Kinja'd!!!0

Ford is notorious for under-rating these engines, it would seem. The 1.6L EB is generating well over 200 lbs of torque at the wheels so crnak torque is much higher. Even a conservative tune gets another 20 or so at the wheels. THey are little powerhouses for sure.


Kinja'd!!! dogisbadob > Yowen - not necessarily not spaghetti and meatballs
03/13/2014 at 16:15

Kinja'd!!!0

Ford should ditch the 2.5L and just use the Focus's 2.0L as their base engine


Kinja'd!!! Yowen - not necessarily not spaghetti and meatballs > dogisbadob
03/13/2014 at 16:17

Kinja'd!!!1

Hmm. Is the 2.0 of a newer generation of engines?


Kinja'd!!! dogisbadob > Yowen - not necessarily not spaghetti and meatballs
03/13/2014 at 16:42

Kinja'd!!!0

I think so.

The 2.5 has been around forever!


Kinja'd!!! Yowen - not necessarily not spaghetti and meatballs > dogisbadob
03/13/2014 at 16:45

Kinja'd!!!0

Yeah, I did not like it when I test drove a Fusion so-equipped. My dad has a Focus with the 2.0, he likes it very much. The car has been awesome for him (it's '12, I think).


Kinja'd!!! Depressoiscool > dogisbadob
03/13/2014 at 17:51

Kinja'd!!!1

isn't it still the bored out version of the 2.3 that was in the first fusion, ranger, and mazda's?


Kinja'd!!! dogisbadob > Depressoiscool
03/13/2014 at 18:15

Kinja'd!!!0

Yeah I think it is