Put the PA Performance starter in the '67 Mustang

Kinja'd!!! "The WB" (thewb)
02/13/2014 at 23:56 • Filed to: None

Kinja'd!!!3 Kinja'd!!! 5
Kinja'd!!!

And it sounds weird. Like a cross between a Ford truck and a Honda starter. But boy does it start. And it spins faster, with less battery drain. It also weighs half as much since it's a PMGR. I'll post a video of it starting sometime so you all can hear the oddity of it. It doesn't fit with the car to my ear because I've heard that classic Ford sound for so long.

Install took me maybe 40 minutes taking my sweet time, routing the starter wires all prettily.

There's a writeup FordMuscle did that's better than anything I could do, so !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!

Also, my auto trans is leaking fluid like a sieve. A 5 speed is in order, just have to find one I can rebuild after I get a workbench put together.


DISCUSSION (5)


Kinja'd!!! Bad Idea Hat > The WB
02/13/2014 at 23:58

Kinja'd!!!0

And it sounds weird. Like a cross between a Ford truck and a Honda starter

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! BiTurbo228 - Dr Frankenstein of Spitfires > The WB
02/14/2014 at 07:22

Kinja'd!!!0

I love geared starters. I've got one for my Spitfire 6 project, and the 6-cylinder hi-torque starter weighs just a little bit less than the standard 4-cylinder one.

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! The WB > Bad Idea Hat
02/14/2014 at 13:25

Kinja'd!!!1

I will post a video of it cranking. It is an unusual sound to hear from vintage iron.


Kinja'd!!! The WB > BiTurbo228 - Dr Frankenstein of Spitfires
02/14/2014 at 13:26

Kinja'd!!!0

Yes, and the positive engagement is nicer on flywheel teeth. It also clears my headers by significantly more than the old one, meaning less heat soak.


Kinja'd!!! Bad Idea Hat > The WB
02/14/2014 at 13:27

Kinja'd!!!0

I can't even imagine that.