![]() 02/11/2014 at 18:25 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() 02/11/2014 at 18:32 |
|
That's actually a brilliant idea because if the horse has to shit on the move, you won't be in danger of getting hit by the feces.
![]() 02/11/2014 at 18:33 |
|
Go Ferdinand, go!
![]() 02/11/2014 at 18:33 |
|
I would also like to point out that there is probably a good power to weight ratio here.
![]() 02/11/2014 at 18:34 |
|
Nicely done
![]() 02/11/2014 at 18:34 |
|
this wins all the things.
![]() 02/11/2014 at 18:35 |
|
Am I the only one that sees this and KNOWS he's having more fun that the guy next to him with the horse in front?
![]() 02/11/2014 at 18:40 |
|
I would have to agree with Sherlock Holmes on this one.
![]() 02/11/2014 at 18:48 |
|
Sort of like racing in reverse gear. Whole new challenge.
![]() 02/11/2014 at 19:36 |
|
One horsepower for every 1000 pounds? And not even a manual... although on the plus side brown is a standard color.
![]() 02/11/2014 at 19:39 |
|
Yea, good point with the power to weight part, but how can you say not a manual? It's a one speed plus reverse. The gear shift is in his hands.
![]() 02/11/2014 at 20:49 |
|
I'm not so sure... I think that a horse has multiple gears:
... about the manual vs auto I guess you could argue both ways. My idea is that with an automatic car, if you want to go faster you press the gas pedal... likewise with a horse you tell it to go faster by squeezing it with your legs (you only ever steer it with your hands) but you don't have control over which "gear" it is in, just how fast it is going.