"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
12/25/2014 at 13:45 • Filed to: wpeo | 0 | 9 |
This is the first time I've ever seen (or at least noticed) Range Rover's first official acknowledgment that they compete against S-Classes, not Land Cruisers. The difference in length is fairly subtle, but still easily discernible. And let me tell you, it is about the most dignified SUV I've ever seen. 10/10 would chauffeur the queen of England around in. Unfortunately, rain.
It looked just like this, only with a silver roof.
Funktheduck
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/25/2014 at 13:52 | 0 |
Silver roof on black car. It's not competing with Mercedes it's competing with Mini Cooper.
Svend
> Funktheduck
12/25/2014 at 14:05 | 0 |
That sounds like a good idea to me.
Something like:
would be nice.
EDIT:
It's been done already.
Jordan and the Slowrunner, Boomer Intensifies
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/25/2014 at 14:10 | 0 |
Not the first LWB Range Rover.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Funktheduck
12/25/2014 at 14:13 | 1 |
Must be a British thing.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Jordan and the Slowrunner, Boomer Intensifies
12/25/2014 at 14:16 | 0 |
Oh. I'm not familiar with others. Where they production models?
Jordan and the Slowrunner, Boomer Intensifies
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/25/2014 at 14:21 | 1 |
Yes, the Range Rover County was the LWB version of the Range Rover Classic. I would give a pic, but my phone doesn't do Kinja.
Viggen
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/25/2014 at 14:23 | 1 |
Didn't know there was a current production LWB. Knew the classic model had one. Rear doors look awkwardly long.
Svend
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/25/2014 at 14:23 | 1 |
Her Majesty has her own which Her Majesty likes to drive.
and the Defender (Land Rover 110) for that matter.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Viggen
12/25/2014 at 14:48 | 0 |
Not on the new one.