"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
12/23/2014 at 20:19 • Filed to: None
3
12|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
12/23/2014 at 20:19 • Filed to: None | 3
| 12 |
M3 or CTS-V? I'll take both.
jkm7680
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/23/2014 at 20:21 |
|
Have to go with the M3 on this one. The CTS is a bit too dated for my liking.
Louros
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/23/2014 at 20:22 |
|
New hotness M3, or old and busted Caddy?
No contest.
BadMotorScooter
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/23/2014 at 20:26 |
|
Beige Corolla!!
mybeatersabimmer
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/23/2014 at 20:26 |
|
M3... It's pure sex on wheels
titsinmymitts
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/23/2014 at 20:41 |
|
Real comparison would be ATS-V vs M4. Or CTS-V vs M5.
Not really sure tbh. Maybe ATS-V.
Manuél Ferrari
> jkm7680
12/23/2014 at 20:51 |
|
But you don't even like BMWs!
|
Manuél Ferrari
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/23/2014 at 20:52 |
|
I like the way you think!
If getting both I think I would go M4. That way coupe + sedan.
|
jkm7680
> Manuél Ferrari
12/23/2014 at 21:15 |
|
This is partially true.
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Louros
12/23/2014 at 22:58 |
|
Only out of production for (less than) a year, and I'm not sure how it qualifies as busted.
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> titsinmymitts
12/23/2014 at 23:08 |
|
Correct, but I couldn't find either of those parked in a pair.
Jayhawk Jake
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/24/2014 at 00:01 |
|
CTS-V because Murica.
AMGtech - now with more recalls!
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/24/2014 at 02:00 |
|
Having driven them... I'll take the Range Rover Sport.